Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Ashrym" data-source="post: 7850897" data-attributes="member: 6750235">No one knows that.&nbsp; That's part of the issue.&nbsp; We're guessing at intent here.Right now, there's no changing of per long rest at all.&nbsp; The intent per the video was that these classes would swap a spell leveling up more often than some tables do.&nbsp;&nbsp; That's not a demonstration of the intent for a lot of swapping of spells at all.&nbsp; The choice to add spell swapping was because the swapping from leveling up took longer at some tables than others.The original expectation from leveling up matches a much more limited expectation from long rest swaps.Then the comment was made that wizards still have their identity despite the changes because swapping one spell per long rest to known spell classes, which implies a more open expectation.The only thing any of us knows for sure at this point is that the wording needs to be more clear to match the intent.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Ashrym, post: 7850897, member: 6750235"] No one knows that. That's part of the issue. We're guessing at intent here. Right now, there's no changing of per long rest at all. [B]The intent per the video was that these classes would swap a spell leveling up more often than some tables do.[/B] That's not a demonstration of the intent for a lot of swapping of spells at all. The choice to add spell swapping was because the swapping from leveling up took longer at some tables than others. The original expectation from leveling up matches a much more limited expectation from long rest swaps. Then the comment was made that wizards still have their identity despite the changes because swapping one spell per long rest to known spell classes, which implies a more open expectation. The only thing any of us knows for sure at this point is that the wording needs to be more clear to match the intent. [/QUOTE]

Verification