Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Chaosmancer" data-source="post: 7853223" data-attributes="member: 6801228">That is not my argument. So... I'm not being absurd? I'll repost the paragraph, maybe you can see what I'm actually trying to say. This up here ^If the party doesn't have a wizard, this feature does not overshadow them. If the wizard has the spell already, this feature does not overshadow themIf the wizard has no idea where to obtain the spell in question, this feature does not overshadow them. If the party can't wait 24 hours for the other class (bard or sorcerer or ranger) to use this feature, this feature does not overshadow them. Yes, additionally, if the cleric or druid could access the required spell, this feature would not overshadow the wizard. It is true that Sword of Spirit's example highlights a potential problem, but for it to be an actual problem at the table, you need a sorcerer with this feature, a wizard, a challenge that requires a specific spell, that spell to not currently be in the wizard's spellbook but could be if they traveled a few days, that challenge can wait that period of time, the sorcerer instead using this feature because it is a spell they share on their list, and then the wizard getting upset that the sorcerer saved them time and money by doing for free what they were going to do. If one facet of that scenario is not true, this feature is not a problem for the wizard. That is what I am trying to say.</blockquote>