Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="tetrasodium" data-source="post: 7853896" data-attributes="member: 93670"><p>I'd wager because of a few reasons</p><ul>
<li data-xf-list-type="ul">cleric &amp; druid are getting the same on level cantrip versatility as wizards &amp; already pick from class lists as divine casters</li>
<li data-xf-list-type="ul">There isn't as much overlap between arcane &amp; divine caster spell lists as between wizard/sorcerer.&nbsp; They also tend to have far less overlap of their party roles as wizard/sorcerer.</li>
<li data-xf-list-type="ul">When people said words to the extent of&nbsp; &quot;I don't mind sorcerer getting this, but it feels like it will be hurting wizard identity&nbsp; because so much of everything they can do is able to be effectively duplicated by so many others already, wizards should get some kind of meaty flavorful bone &amp; cantrip versatility should also be on long rest instead of on level&quot; people disingenuously tried to make bad faith arguments about wizard features in isolation in attempts to argue that wizards were too good to even discuss those concerns... In short... the answer to your question is because people came out saying &quot;suck it gitgud&quot; in response to concerns about how this would effect the wizard class identity &amp; tried to leverage that to defend against arguments on spell versatility being too good that nobody was making.</li>
</ul></blockquote><p></p>

[QUOTE="tetrasodium, post: 7853896, member: 93670"] I'd wager because of a few reasons [LIST] [*]cleric & druid are getting the same on level cantrip versatility as wizards & already pick from class lists as divine casters [*]There isn't as much overlap between arcane & divine caster spell lists as between wizard/sorcerer. They also tend to have far less overlap of their party roles as wizard/sorcerer. [*]When people said words to the extent of "I don't mind sorcerer getting this, but it feels like it will be hurting wizard identity because so much of everything they can do is able to be effectively duplicated by so many others already, wizards should get some kind of meaty flavorful bone & cantrip versatility should also be on long rest instead of on level" people disingenuously tried to make bad faith arguments about wizard features in isolation in attempts to argue that wizards were too good to even discuss those concerns... In short... the answer to your question is because people came out saying "suck it gitgud" in response to concerns about how this would effect the wizard class identity & tried to leverage that to defend against arguments on spell versatility being too good that nobody was making. [/LIST] [/QUOTE]

Verification