Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Next
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
Twitch
YouTube
Facebook (EN Publishing)
Facebook (EN World)
Twitter
Instagram
TikTok
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
The
VOIDRUNNER'S CODEX
is coming! Explore new worlds, fight oppressive empires, fend off fearsome aliens, and wield deadly psionics with this comprehensive boxed set expansion for 5E and A5E!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
UA Spell Versatility: A deeper dive
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Ashrym" data-source="post: 7854261" data-attributes="member: 6750235"><p>Okay, so you are fine with why the options were proposed. When I repeat the goals and solutions to help keep the conversation on track confirming you understand those are the goals and proposed options to meet them is good to keep us on the same page.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>This is where I see the disconnect. "The sorcerer defenders" creates an "us versus them pick a side" argument that distracts from the points I made regarding goals and options to meet those goals. When you say you understand that cantrip versatility was given on leveling up because it addresses the respeccing concern and you say you understand spell versatility was given on long rest to because it addresses spell swapping rate concerns then I would ask you what concern does changing cantrip versatility to a long rest swap address?</p><p></p><p>There's no connection between "does not have a cantrip respeccing mechanic" and "spells are not getting swapped as often as intended". Spell versatility addresses an intended use of those classes and how they use spells so that they are WAI. There's no bridge from that point to apply the same logic to cantrips for wizards, who are already working as intended.</p><p></p><p>Cantrip versatility on a long rest is addressing something that was not intended and without an underlying need that needs addressed.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Ashrym, post: 7854261, member: 6750235"] Okay, so you are fine with why the options were proposed. When I repeat the goals and solutions to help keep the conversation on track confirming you understand those are the goals and proposed options to meet them is good to keep us on the same page. This is where I see the disconnect. "The sorcerer defenders" creates an "us versus them pick a side" argument that distracts from the points I made regarding goals and options to meet those goals. When you say you understand that cantrip versatility was given on leveling up because it addresses the respeccing concern and you say you understand spell versatility was given on long rest to because it addresses spell swapping rate concerns then I would ask you what concern does changing cantrip versatility to a long rest swap address? There's no connection between "does not have a cantrip respeccing mechanic" and "spells are not getting swapped as often as intended". Spell versatility addresses an intended use of those classes and how they use spells so that they are WAI. There's no bridge from that point to apply the same logic to cantrips for wizards, who are already working as intended. Cantrip versatility on a long rest is addressing something that was not intended and without an underlying need that needs addressed. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
UA Spell Versatility: A deeper dive
Top