Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Tony Vargas" data-source="post: 7854474" data-attributes="member: 996">The latter's valid, IMHO. It's also just bizarre to continue to make casting easier &amp; more versatile.&nbsp; Each ed I wonder how they're going to pull it off, and each ed, they do.&nbsp; After 4e, with at-will attack spells and OAs only for range/area spell or not, and close-AE spells getting no OAs at all, and implements, and everything else, with about the only meaningful restriction on some spells being an action to maintain them, I thought, there's no way they could soft-ball the restrictions on casting any further.Not only was I wrong ('s'OK, I'm used to it), as 5e happily removed OAs, let you cast spells even while concentrating on another, and gave everyone not only at-wills but spontaneous casting, but, now, they have to go and let you take back your known spell choices on a daily basis? How is 6e supposed to coddle the pointy-hat set any more than this?….IDK, but I'm sure it'll find a way.( I know, I know:&nbsp;&nbsp; &quot;in the snow, up-hill, both ways!&quot;)</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Tony Vargas, post: 7854474, member: 996"] The latter's valid, IMHO. It's also just bizarre to continue to make casting easier & more versatile. Each ed I wonder how they're going to pull it off, and each ed, they do. After 4e, with at-will attack spells and OAs only for range/area spell or not, and close-AE spells getting no OAs at all, and implements, and everything else, with about the only meaningful restriction on some spells being an action to maintain them, I thought, there's no way they could soft-ball the restrictions on casting any further. Not only was I wrong ('s'OK, I'm used to it), as 5e happily removed OAs, let you cast spells even while concentrating on another, and gave everyone not only at-wills but spontaneous casting, but, now, they have to go and let you take back your known spell choices [I]on a daily basis[/I]? How is 6e supposed to coddle the pointy-hat set any more than this? ….IDK, but I'm sure it'll find a way. ( I know, I know: "in the snow, up-hill, [I]both ways![/I]") [/QUOTE]

Verification