Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
UA Spell Versatility: A deeper dive
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Chaosmancer" data-source="post: 7864607" data-attributes="member: 6801228"><p>We are talking about an NPC right? </p><p></p><p>In which case... they will either have the spell or they won't. Period. </p><p></p><p>If the DM says that the sorcerer doesn't have access to that spell, no amount of players pointing to optional rules will change that. </p><p></p><p>I think that is a big thing that is a difference. Either between playstyles or intentions. If my players go to an arcanist of any stripe, I determine whether or not that NPC is capable of doing what they want. If they go to a wizard looking for help reaching a location and I decide that Wizard casts Wind Walk on them, even though that is not a wizard spell and the wizard should have no way to cast that, then that wizard casts Wind Walk on them. </p><p></p><p>So, I don't get the argument on how this rule changes the interactions with NPCs. It just doesn't, because the DM has always decided if a given spellcaster has the necessary spell. And they will use the same method to determine that that they always have. And if they change that, it is their choice as a DM.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Chaosmancer, post: 7864607, member: 6801228"] We are talking about an NPC right? In which case... they will either have the spell or they won't. Period. If the DM says that the sorcerer doesn't have access to that spell, no amount of players pointing to optional rules will change that. I think that is a big thing that is a difference. Either between playstyles or intentions. If my players go to an arcanist of any stripe, I determine whether or not that NPC is capable of doing what they want. If they go to a wizard looking for help reaching a location and I decide that Wizard casts Wind Walk on them, even though that is not a wizard spell and the wizard should have no way to cast that, then that wizard casts Wind Walk on them. So, I don't get the argument on how this rule changes the interactions with NPCs. It just doesn't, because the DM has always decided if a given spellcaster has the necessary spell. And they will use the same method to determine that that they always have. And if they change that, it is their choice as a DM. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
UA Spell Versatility: A deeper dive
Top