Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
UA: Why 3d6 for the "Bell Curve" variant, instead of 2d10?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Azlan" data-source="post: 1398617" data-attributes="member: 2340"><p>I'm of the opinion that the Unearthed Arcana is not a well thought as it should've been.</p><p></p><p>One of the variants that initially sounds appealing to me, but ends up rubbing me wrong, is the "bell curve" variant that uses 3d6 to replace all d20 rolls. But why 3d6? To me, that's going from one extreme to another. Wouldn't 2d10 be a better alternative than 3d6?</p><p></p><p>First of all, there are many good reasons for going with the bell curve roll, rather than a single, linear die roll, for saving throws, skill rolls, etc. On the following webpage, a guy explains those reasons well with his "Linear vs Non-Linear Dice" essay...</p><p></p><p><a href="http://www.frontiernet.net/~jamesstarlight/LinearVsNonLinear.html" target="_blank">http://www.frontiernet.net/~jamesstarlight/LinearVsNonLinear.html</a></p><p></p><p>Myself, I've long since come to the conclusion that "non-linear" is the better way to go. But, 3d6... ?! No, if you're going to go non-linear, then using 2d10 is better than using 3d6.</p><p></p><p>For one thing, with 2d10 you get almost the same range of numbers as you do with a d20; i.e. 2-20 with 2d10, compared to 1-20 with a d20; whereas with 3d6, you get a range of only 3-18.</p><p></p><p>For another thing, the bell curve created by using 2d10 is less extreme than the one created by using 3d6; i.e. with 2d10 you have better chances of rolling the numbers on each end of the range than you do with 3d6. So, although you are still making an impact on the game system by using 2d10, it's less than it would be with 3d6.</p><p></p><p>BTW: With the 3d6 bell curve variant, the threat ranges of criticals are increased by 1, right? But with the extreme bell curve created by using 3d6, increasing the threat ranges by 1 does not suffice, because you are still getting much less a chance for rolling within a weapon's increased threat range than you would be with a d20 rolling within the original threat range. However, with a 2d10 bell curve, increasing the threat ranges by 1 is adequate, because this way you are close enough to getting the same chance for rolling within a weapon's increased threat range as you would be with a d20 within the original threat range.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Azlan, post: 1398617, member: 2340"] I'm of the opinion that the Unearthed Arcana is not a well thought as it should've been. One of the variants that initially sounds appealing to me, but ends up rubbing me wrong, is the "bell curve" variant that uses 3d6 to replace all d20 rolls. But why 3d6? To me, that's going from one extreme to another. Wouldn't 2d10 be a better alternative than 3d6? First of all, there are many good reasons for going with the bell curve roll, rather than a single, linear die roll, for saving throws, skill rolls, etc. On the following webpage, a guy explains those reasons well with his "Linear vs Non-Linear Dice" essay... [url]http://www.frontiernet.net/~jamesstarlight/LinearVsNonLinear.html[/url] Myself, I've long since come to the conclusion that "non-linear" is the better way to go. But, 3d6... ?! No, if you're going to go non-linear, then using 2d10 is better than using 3d6. For one thing, with 2d10 you get almost the same range of numbers as you do with a d20; i.e. 2-20 with 2d10, compared to 1-20 with a d20; whereas with 3d6, you get a range of only 3-18. For another thing, the bell curve created by using 2d10 is less extreme than the one created by using 3d6; i.e. with 2d10 you have better chances of rolling the numbers on each end of the range than you do with 3d6. So, although you are still making an impact on the game system by using 2d10, it's less than it would be with 3d6. BTW: With the 3d6 bell curve variant, the threat ranges of criticals are increased by 1, right? But with the extreme bell curve created by using 3d6, increasing the threat ranges by 1 does not suffice, because you are still getting much less a chance for rolling within a weapon's increased threat range than you would be with a d20 rolling within the original threat range. However, with a 2d10 bell curve, increasing the threat ranges by 1 is adequate, because this way you are close enough to getting the same chance for rolling within a weapon's increased threat range as you would be with a d20 within the original threat range. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
UA: Why 3d6 for the "Bell Curve" variant, instead of 2d10?
Top