Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
UA: Why 3d6 for the "Bell Curve" variant, instead of 2d10?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="swrushing" data-source="post: 1399971" data-attributes="member: 14140"><p>This is a logical error.</p><p></p><p>A d216 has just as much chance of rolling a 1-1-1 as a 3-4-3, just as a d10 has the same chance of rolling a 3 as an 11.</p><p></p><p>How likely you are to succeed in either case depends on how many of those potential rolls you assign "succeeds" and how many you assign "fails". </p><p></p><p>if rolling 1d20 you chose to say "1-3 fails" you are saying "you will succeed 85% of the time on average." On any given roll, the outcome is not certain... because you said so.</p><p></p><p>if rolling 3d6 you chose to say "you will succeed 85% of the time" you will assign a fail range of 3-7 and the outcome will, for any given roll, be uncertain.</p><p></p><p>What is happening when you say "roll 3d6, you fail on a 3" is that you are saying the chance of success is NOT 85% but 99+%. In d20 you would have frankly just said "you succeed" and not needed a roll.</p><p></p><p>3d6 wont produce more predictable "results" in terms of success fail than d20 will unless you start assigning greater chances of success for 3d6 than for the d20. Simply put, if you assign a d20 task a 15% chance of failure and the same task under 3d6 a 5% chance of failure, its not the DICE that are making you more likely to succeed under 3d6, its the greater chance of success you CHOSE!</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="swrushing, post: 1399971, member: 14140"] This is a logical error. A d216 has just as much chance of rolling a 1-1-1 as a 3-4-3, just as a d10 has the same chance of rolling a 3 as an 11. How likely you are to succeed in either case depends on how many of those potential rolls you assign "succeeds" and how many you assign "fails". if rolling 1d20 you chose to say "1-3 fails" you are saying "you will succeed 85% of the time on average." On any given roll, the outcome is not certain... because you said so. if rolling 3d6 you chose to say "you will succeed 85% of the time" you will assign a fail range of 3-7 and the outcome will, for any given roll, be uncertain. What is happening when you say "roll 3d6, you fail on a 3" is that you are saying the chance of success is NOT 85% but 99+%. In d20 you would have frankly just said "you succeed" and not needed a roll. 3d6 wont produce more predictable "results" in terms of success fail than d20 will unless you start assigning greater chances of success for 3d6 than for the d20. Simply put, if you assign a d20 task a 15% chance of failure and the same task under 3d6 a 5% chance of failure, its not the DICE that are making you more likely to succeed under 3d6, its the greater chance of success you CHOSE! [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
UA: Why 3d6 for the "Bell Curve" variant, instead of 2d10?
Top