Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Janx" data-source="post: 7652628" data-attributes="member: 8835">I don't disagree with your logic either, as I alluded in my first post on this thread.  It may not be a good idea to go naming the guy you don't like in public.Heck, chastizing somebody in public for their public act of bad behavior is the same risk for yourself as the bad actor took in drawing reactive attention.To me it's just risk.  Each party is free to decide how how they want to react.It is always wrong to behave badly.  It is not wrong to oppose and respond in force against bad behavior.  Sometimes, YOU are somebody else's Karma coming back to bite them.  Without this, there is no consequence for bad behavior.Obviously, there is such thing as going overboard with the force used in a response.  If not legally, then societally.  Like the new car commercial where the kid keeps taking his clothes off and throwing them out the window while the car is moving and laughing about it.  The commercial isn't going to show it, but the kid should not be laughing by the end of that episode.  A correct response might be a slap on the hand to teach him not to do that anymore.  Packing more clothes to replace the lost ones is not an acceptable adult response.  Nor is hauling the kid out and giving him 40 lashes with a crop.Whatever your parenting style, doing nothing teaches nothing.  Likewise, doing too much will get you too much trouble.Choose wisely</blockquote>