Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Grover Cleaveland" data-source="post: 2695367" data-attributes="member: 34932">I think that's a poor business strategy, actually. I think you'd have better results putting all the basic mechanics on your website and then charging for the book and its supplements. I'm not likely to care about things that I can't sample. It's the same with music - I'm more likely to be interested in a band I've heard .mp3s of than one I've merely read about. I say this not because I'm greedy and want your mechanics for free - I'm biased to think they're terrible, so I'm not particularly interested. The only way to convince me otherwise is to actually show them to me. But, I mean, it's your call. Your argumentative style is no more objective than mine, except in the sense that you're slightly less willing to acknowledge alternate viewpoints. Your grasp of logic is also very poor, your arguments peppered with numerous nonsequiturs.I do generally prefer mysteries to rigid facts, but I don't think that hurts gameplay at all - in fact, it can be seen to improve it.</blockquote>