Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Artoomis" data-source="post: 94050" data-attributes="member: 111">This will be pretty long, as I'm going to address each of Archer's comments.&nbsp; I'll be updating the WEb site later (today?) based on your comments, Archer.&nbsp; Lot's of good stuff in there - thank you very much for helping, Archer!&nbsp; <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile&nbsp; &nbsp; :)"&nbsp; data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /><img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile&nbsp; &nbsp; :)"&nbsp; data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /><img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile&nbsp; &nbsp; :)"&nbsp; data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /><img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile&nbsp; &nbsp; :)"&nbsp; data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" />I've put the item number in my answers so that anyone could quote only my answer for comments and we'd be able to put it in context. &nbsp;3.&nbsp; I didn't know about the Windrider.&nbsp; What book is that in? 4.&nbsp; Tne rules are nowhere near 99.9% clear as witnessed by earlier discussion on this point.&nbsp; The &quot;Best Advice&quot; is against the Sage's ruling because I get to decide what the &quot;Best Advice.&quot; The rules can be interpreted either way quite easily, and both sides of the argument see the rules as clearly supporting their side. 11.&nbsp; Well, then, what about helms?&nbsp; They take up the &quot;hat&quot; slot - does that mean they aren't armor either? 12.&nbsp; Thanks.&nbsp; I haven't gotten around to looking up the rules citation or looking for the Sage's ruling (which I know was sent by e-mail). 14.&nbsp; Fair enough - I'll add that in. 18.&nbsp; Good input.&nbsp; I'll add it in. 19.&nbsp; I agree - but the rules are not quite crystal clear and I need to capture that.&nbsp; I haven't gone back to look for the opposing argument yet. 20.&nbsp; Thanks.&nbsp; Any references? 21.&nbsp; Are you sure about the Sage's advice? And, if so, how do you combine them? You are partially correct about the rules - it is probably better to simply say that the rules are silent on the issue, and also quote the rules for multiple metamagics on a spell. 22.&nbsp; I'll add yout thoughts. 23.&nbsp; It's &quot;not exactly&quot; because you do get something for thrown weapons with the feat - you get to draw a second weapon in the time it takes to draw one weapon. Do you have a better suggestion for how to state that fact? 26.&nbsp; Are you sure?&nbsp; I am certain that folks have said the opposite, but I don't have any quotes from the Sage.&nbsp; Perhaps you do? 28.&nbsp; Don't the feats or abilities that let you change direction mean you can change direction during a charge?&nbsp; This is different from using a readied action to attempt to do that - sometimes you'll get no action at all when trying to use a readied action for a charge in a new direction.&nbsp; Nonetheless, I'll have to update to add your comment in the &quot;Argument Against&quot; section.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Artoomis, post: 94050, member: 111"] This will be pretty long, as I'm going to address each of Archer's comments. I'll be updating the WEb site later (today?) based on your comments, Archer. Lot's of good stuff in there - thank you very much for helping, Archer! :):):):) I've put the item number in my answers so that anyone could quote only my answer for comments and we'd be able to put it in context. [B][/B] 3. I didn't know about the Windrider. What book is that in? [B][/B] 4. Tne rules are nowhere near 99.9% clear as witnessed by earlier discussion on this point. The "Best Advice" is against the Sage's ruling because I get to decide what the "Best Advice." The rules can be interpreted either way quite easily, and both sides of the argument see the rules as clearly supporting their side.[B][/B] 11. Well, then, what about helms? They take up the "hat" slot - does that mean they aren't armor either?[B][/B] 12. Thanks. I haven't gotten around to looking up the rules citation or looking for the Sage's ruling (which I know was sent by e-mail). [B][/B] 14. Fair enough - I'll add that in. [B][/B] 18. Good input. I'll add it in. [B][/B] 19. I agree - but the rules are not quite crystal clear and I need to capture that. I haven't gone back to look for the opposing argument yet. [B][/B] 20. Thanks. Any references? [B][/B] 21. Are you sure about the Sage's advice? And, if so, how do you combine them? You are partially correct about the rules - it is probably better to simply say that the rules are silent on the issue, and also quote the rules for multiple metamagics on a spell.[B][/B] 22. I'll add yout thoughts. [B][/B] 23. It's "not exactly" because you do get something for thrown weapons with the feat - you get to draw a second weapon in the time it takes to draw one weapon. Do you have a better suggestion for how to state that fact?[B][/B] 26. Are you sure? I am certain that folks have said the opposite, but I don't have any quotes from the Sage. Perhaps you do? 28. Don't the feats or abilities that let you change direction mean you can change direction during a charge? This is different from using a readied action to attempt to do that - sometimes you'll get no action at all when trying to use a readied action for a charge in a new direction. Nonetheless, I'll have to update to add your comment in the "Argument Against" section. [/QUOTE]

Verification