Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Shisumo" data-source="post: 5330908" data-attributes="member: 85314">It's actually a druid using greater magic fang, and the criticism isn't about using it in gneral, it's that it doesn't actually add useful data to the damage comparison that is the thread's point.&nbsp; The issue is that if anyone in the group has greater magic weapon, then they probably all do, so including it for the cleric but excluding it for the fighter doesn't actually add meaningful distinction for determining the baseline amount of damage a class can do (the thread's stated purpose).&nbsp; It is, in effect, gaming the system for the purposes of &quot;winning&quot; the thread or something, and not actually useful.&nbsp; Of course a cleric should use greater magic weapon on her own weapon.&nbsp; She should also put it on the fighter and the rogue.&nbsp; That's just good tactics.&nbsp;Not explicitly, but I can't imagine what else he's going to do.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Shisumo, post: 5330908, member: 85314"] It's actually a druid using [i]greater magic fang[/i], and the criticism isn't about using it in gneral, it's that it doesn't actually add useful data to the damage comparison that is the thread's point. The issue is that if anyone in the group has [i]greater magic weapon[/i], then they probably [i]all[/i] do, so including it for the cleric but excluding it for the fighter doesn't actually add meaningful distinction for determining the baseline amount of damage a class can do (the thread's stated purpose). It is, in effect, gaming the system for the purposes of "winning" the thread or something, and not actually useful. Of course a cleric should use [i]greater magic weapon[/i] on her own weapon. She should also put it on the fighter and the rogue. That's just good tactics. Not explicitly, but I can't imagine what else he's going to do. [/QUOTE]

Verification