Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Unarmored Defense and Surprise
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Faenor" data-source="post: 6922830" data-attributes="member: 6788085"><p>Ok, thank you. That's the sucker punch scenario that these discussions always come to. And it's the debate about what 'threat' means, as in '...become aware of a threat.' When initiative is rolled. So the thing about that is turn based play is the method for resolving combat. Stepping back, the everything in the game could be resolved turn based, it's only not because it's too cumbersome. So if you start that peaceful npc interaction, each pc or npc is choosing what to do with their turn to not attack. If it's a tense interaction, they all could be taking dodged or ready actions. To take the ready action, they'd need to have their weapon out because ready gives a reaction, and you don't get interaction with an object to draw on the reaction. So it becomes persuasion checks to convince the npc not to be taking the dodge action on his turn. From the pc perspective, in combat you do have to announce your action before you roll initiatives, but then on subsequent rounds you don't, but only because it becomes cumbersome. One way to set it up so that the PCs are more vulnerable to the sucker punch, so that they are lulled and don't announce that they'll take the dodge or ready action, could be to continue to require announce until an attack is made by anyone. Another way would be to impose disadvantage on persuasion checks for ready or dodge action, as it takes a combative pose.</p><p></p><p>Also, the analogy to modern combat and weapons can't be used in d&d without breaking the way d&d simulates combat. In d&d, hit points are not health points. Damage doesn't reduce combat capabilities. A sword hit can't be an actual flesh penetration, or it all breaks down. In modern combat, almost any 'damage' is going to result in essentialy unconscious condition. Finally, the 6 second round only simulates medieval combat. Modern combat, on an individual basis- not the platoon or battalion scale- is a matter of fractions of a second to be won or lost.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Faenor, post: 6922830, member: 6788085"] Ok, thank you. That's the sucker punch scenario that these discussions always come to. And it's the debate about what 'threat' means, as in '...become aware of a threat.' When initiative is rolled. So the thing about that is turn based play is the method for resolving combat. Stepping back, the everything in the game could be resolved turn based, it's only not because it's too cumbersome. So if you start that peaceful npc interaction, each pc or npc is choosing what to do with their turn to not attack. If it's a tense interaction, they all could be taking dodged or ready actions. To take the ready action, they'd need to have their weapon out because ready gives a reaction, and you don't get interaction with an object to draw on the reaction. So it becomes persuasion checks to convince the npc not to be taking the dodge action on his turn. From the pc perspective, in combat you do have to announce your action before you roll initiatives, but then on subsequent rounds you don't, but only because it becomes cumbersome. One way to set it up so that the PCs are more vulnerable to the sucker punch, so that they are lulled and don't announce that they'll take the dodge or ready action, could be to continue to require announce until an attack is made by anyone. Another way would be to impose disadvantage on persuasion checks for ready or dodge action, as it takes a combative pose. Also, the analogy to modern combat and weapons can't be used in d&d without breaking the way d&d simulates combat. In d&d, hit points are not health points. Damage doesn't reduce combat capabilities. A sword hit can't be an actual flesh penetration, or it all breaks down. In modern combat, almost any 'damage' is going to result in essentialy unconscious condition. Finally, the 6 second round only simulates medieval combat. Modern combat, on an individual basis- not the platoon or battalion scale- is a matter of fractions of a second to be won or lost. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Unarmored Defense and Surprise
Top