Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Rocket your D&D 5E and Level Up: Advanced 5E games into space! Alpha Star Magazine Is Launching... Right Now!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
Unbelievable Scale of AI’s Pirated-Books Problem
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="The Sigil" data-source="post: 9617475" data-attributes="member: 2013"><p>Again, an LLM itself does not contain copyrighted material. It is basically a collection of facts ABOUT the copyrighted material (mostly 'what word probably follows this other word' but still is not the copyrighted material itself). Placing the LLM into the public domain would not give access to the copyrighted material used to build it.</p><p></p><p>And while perhaps Meta <em>should</em> be required to pay a fine to the rights holders for every piece of material they accessed illegally, even locating all of the rights holders would be an impossible task (since even if we can identify the authors of each piece of copyrighted material they infringed upon, we have to track down each author AND if copyright was transferred, such as in the case of a work-for-hire, we have to figure out to whom the copyright was transferred including in cases where copyright may have been transferred multiple times), much less compensating them. In the ideal world, yes, this works. In the real world, where it is often difficult to locate rights-holders for even a <em>single</em> work, let alone identify all of them for a number of works on this scale, this is simply not feasible. Idealism is great, but in practical cases, it must bow to reality. Deleting every copy of the LLM might be ideal, but is likewise infeasible. If the data exists in more than one place (e.g., backups) someone is going to have a copy somewhere. It's impossible to put the toothpaste back in the tube.</p><p></p><p>In lieu of $impossible fines, the outcome that is at least reasonably <strong>possible </strong>would be the corporate death penalty for Meta with all of its intellectual property assets being forfeited to the public domain. Possible? Sure. Likely? No.</p><p></p><p>However, the most likely outcome I see based on my observations of how our legal system actually works in my lifetime is that Meta stalls this to death with their lawyers, pays a relative pittance to settle the suit, the class action lawyers get most of the proceeds of the settlement and individual authors can sign up to receive a couple of bucks, and no real punishment happens. It's <strong>not </strong>right. It's <strong>not </strong>ethical. It's <strong>not </strong>fair. But it <strong>is </strong>what my cynical self expects to see happen. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f641.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":(" title="Frown :(" data-smilie="3"data-shortname=":(" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="The Sigil, post: 9617475, member: 2013"] Again, an LLM itself does not contain copyrighted material. It is basically a collection of facts ABOUT the copyrighted material (mostly 'what word probably follows this other word' but still is not the copyrighted material itself). Placing the LLM into the public domain would not give access to the copyrighted material used to build it. And while perhaps Meta [I]should[/I] be required to pay a fine to the rights holders for every piece of material they accessed illegally, even locating all of the rights holders would be an impossible task (since even if we can identify the authors of each piece of copyrighted material they infringed upon, we have to track down each author AND if copyright was transferred, such as in the case of a work-for-hire, we have to figure out to whom the copyright was transferred including in cases where copyright may have been transferred multiple times), much less compensating them. In the ideal world, yes, this works. In the real world, where it is often difficult to locate rights-holders for even a [I]single[/I] work, let alone identify all of them for a number of works on this scale, this is simply not feasible. Idealism is great, but in practical cases, it must bow to reality. Deleting every copy of the LLM might be ideal, but is likewise infeasible. If the data exists in more than one place (e.g., backups) someone is going to have a copy somewhere. It's impossible to put the toothpaste back in the tube. In lieu of $impossible fines, the outcome that is at least reasonably [B]possible [/B]would be the corporate death penalty for Meta with all of its intellectual property assets being forfeited to the public domain. Possible? Sure. Likely? No. However, the most likely outcome I see based on my observations of how our legal system actually works in my lifetime is that Meta stalls this to death with their lawyers, pays a relative pittance to settle the suit, the class action lawyers get most of the proceeds of the settlement and individual authors can sign up to receive a couple of bucks, and no real punishment happens. It's [B]not [/B]right. It's [B]not [/B]ethical. It's [B]not [/B]fair. But it [B]is [/B]what my cynical self expects to see happen. :( [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
Unbelievable Scale of AI’s Pirated-Books Problem
Top