Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Dausuul" data-source="post: 6441099" data-attributes="member: 58197">Here's the exchange: [MENTION=80739]dorian[/MENTION]Hart [MENTION=32417]MikeM[/MENTION]earls If a rogue sneak attacks, and before he goes again gets an attack from fighter's Commander's Strike, can he sneak attack again? [MENTION=32417]MikeM[/MENTION]earls [MENTION=80739]dorian[/MENTION]Hart believe sneak attack is usable only on the rogue's turn... [MENTION=32417]MikeM[/MENTION]earls [MENTION=80739]dorian[/MENTION]Hart [MENTION=43039]KEvIn[/MENTION]Kulp pinned down by cat...can't reach PHB... But 1/turn would make it usable w/off turn attacks [MENTION=32417]MikeM[/MENTION]earls [MENTION=80739]dorian[/MENTION]Hart [MENTION=43039]KEvIn[/MENTION]Kulp intent would be to avoid stacking with multiple attacks via multi classingThe way I read this is, Mearls was making the call from memory. He recalled (wrongly) that the PHB said usable only on the rogue's turn. For whatever reason, we can't see PirateCat's comment (I have never really grokked Twitter), but presumably PirateCat was quoting the PHB at him. Mearls then replied that if PirateCat was correct, you could use it on off turn attacks, and the main intent of the rule was that you shouldn't be able to stack Extra Attack with Sneak Attack.Always important to remember that Mike Mearls is a fallible human being. He does not have the PHB memorized and every detail at his fingertips.</blockquote>