Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Undermountain as a Skill Challenge
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Charles Rampant" data-source="post: 7205548" data-attributes="member: 32659"><p>It sounds like people agree on the idea, but not on the very simple tables. I can see that. It's certainly too abstract in my initial version, I'd agree. Something that both [MENTION=20323]Quickleaf[/MENTION] and [MENTION=913]Schmoe[/MENTION] mention is bringing out the flavour more heavily; I wonder if bringing in a very limited element of mapping could help. I'm struggling to think of how to describe this.</p><p></p><p>Okay, so here is the grand map of Undermountain. From my understanding, only parts of this ever received full 5' squares maps; Dungeon, Storeroom, Sargauth for the main levels, and some of the random smaller parts. </p><p></p><p><img src="https://vignette3.wikia.nocookie.net/forgottenrealms/images/f/f6/Undermountain-Profile.jpg/revision/latest?cb=20100218032659" alt="" class="fr-fic fr-dii fr-draggable " data-size="" style="" /></p><p></p><p>[spoiler]As an example of the normal maps, here is the first level. Just so that we're all on the same page. This is the stuff that I'm trying to avoid.</p><p></p><p><img src="https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/originals/d7/0e/d0/d70ed06f3946d883fba32d155a2cc7a8.png" alt="" class="fr-fic fr-dii fr-draggable " data-size="" style="" />[/spoiler]</p><p></p><p>Now, say that we use that first map as our basis. We can have three starting points, for current discussion - Yawning Portal, Sewers, Citadel (which is under the Castle, presumably for extra plot fruitiness). The party wants to get to a dungeon, and they have learned that it is on the first level. So we look at our special reference map thingy, and see that they'd pass through two zones - Entrance (whichever one they use), and 1st. Each of these could have specific events tables associated with them, and each require the Guide to make a roll to determine how many events were met, using multiple sub-tables as suggested. If, however, the party want to get to The Maze Level, and they've discovered The Shaft, then they would need to travel through six zones - Entrance, Dungeon, Storeroom, Sargauth, Shaft, Maze. Again, each comes with its (specific?) table of Stuff, including combat encounters, traps, portals (that might act as permanent shortcuts, so that the party can always in the future get from Dungeon to Maze without any intervening steps, for example). </p><p></p><p>If this was the method taken, I wonder if having discreet roles for party members at all is that helpful. You're already getting beyond the level of abstraction used in AiME or 4e Skill Challenges. Instead, it might be simpler to have "The Party" make a roll of 1d20+proficiency bonus to act as the Guide roll, and then have that prompt a number of events, each of which would be phrased like...</p><p></p><p>"One party member must make an DC20 Arcana check to decipher the runes on this door, or the party will be forced to return to the previous level and try to find another path."</p><p></p><p>"Two party members must make Athletics checks at DC10 to help cross a chasm; each failure will give one party member a level of Exhaustion, as they fall and must be retrieved."</p><p></p><p>Does this sound more... <em>Undermountainy</em> than the abstract method I proposed in the first post? </p><p></p><p>This does have the downside of requiring much more work to create the tables, but admittedly also the upside of not requiring them all to be made up front. Terminus Level's table doesn't need to be made until the party actually heads that far down, for example.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Charles Rampant, post: 7205548, member: 32659"] It sounds like people agree on the idea, but not on the very simple tables. I can see that. It's certainly too abstract in my initial version, I'd agree. Something that both [MENTION=20323]Quickleaf[/MENTION] and [MENTION=913]Schmoe[/MENTION] mention is bringing out the flavour more heavily; I wonder if bringing in a very limited element of mapping could help. I'm struggling to think of how to describe this. Okay, so here is the grand map of Undermountain. From my understanding, only parts of this ever received full 5' squares maps; Dungeon, Storeroom, Sargauth for the main levels, and some of the random smaller parts. [img]https://vignette3.wikia.nocookie.net/forgottenrealms/images/f/f6/Undermountain-Profile.jpg/revision/latest?cb=20100218032659[/img] [spoiler]As an example of the normal maps, here is the first level. Just so that we're all on the same page. This is the stuff that I'm trying to avoid. [img]https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/originals/d7/0e/d0/d70ed06f3946d883fba32d155a2cc7a8.png[/img][/spoiler] Now, say that we use that first map as our basis. We can have three starting points, for current discussion - Yawning Portal, Sewers, Citadel (which is under the Castle, presumably for extra plot fruitiness). The party wants to get to a dungeon, and they have learned that it is on the first level. So we look at our special reference map thingy, and see that they'd pass through two zones - Entrance (whichever one they use), and 1st. Each of these could have specific events tables associated with them, and each require the Guide to make a roll to determine how many events were met, using multiple sub-tables as suggested. If, however, the party want to get to The Maze Level, and they've discovered The Shaft, then they would need to travel through six zones - Entrance, Dungeon, Storeroom, Sargauth, Shaft, Maze. Again, each comes with its (specific?) table of Stuff, including combat encounters, traps, portals (that might act as permanent shortcuts, so that the party can always in the future get from Dungeon to Maze without any intervening steps, for example). If this was the method taken, I wonder if having discreet roles for party members at all is that helpful. You're already getting beyond the level of abstraction used in AiME or 4e Skill Challenges. Instead, it might be simpler to have "The Party" make a roll of 1d20+proficiency bonus to act as the Guide roll, and then have that prompt a number of events, each of which would be phrased like... "One party member must make an DC20 Arcana check to decipher the runes on this door, or the party will be forced to return to the previous level and try to find another path." "Two party members must make Athletics checks at DC10 to help cross a chasm; each failure will give one party member a level of Exhaustion, as they fall and must be retrieved." Does this sound more... [i]Undermountainy[/i] than the abstract method I proposed in the first post? This does have the downside of requiring much more work to create the tables, but admittedly also the upside of not requiring them all to be made up front. Terminus Level's table doesn't need to be made until the party actually heads that far down, for example. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Undermountain as a Skill Challenge
Top