Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Underpowered INT solution - Bonus Skill Proficiencies for high INT
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="5ekyu" data-source="post: 7837147" data-attributes="member: 6919838"><p>More desirable but still not worth it is just cosmetics, seems to me.</p><p></p><p>If you have a penalty, does it reduce skills prof? If not 8 Int dump stat is still a thing.</p><p></p><p>Do you see someone building a character dropping say a 14 con to 10 to raise a 10 int to 14 in order to get 8 proficiencies instead of 6 at first level? Any character can start with at least 6 ptofivirnces in skills+tools, some more. Two more is not that big compared to moving a +2 worth of bonus from a stat they will use. </p><p></p><p>This seems to be going to accomplish two things to me... </p><p></p><p>Move wizards into having more skills, plus any others who already have reason to spin higher INT. Its rewarding more those who already emphasize INT for <em>other reasons</em>.</p><p></p><p>In a few cases push other dump stats - maybe put 8 in STR instead of INT for more dex skills for your agile fighter? Ard you better off just sliding dump stats around ?</p><p></p><p>In my experience, in actual play, wizards dont need "more" - they do well in and out of combat and work very well in all pillars.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="5ekyu, post: 7837147, member: 6919838"] More desirable but still not worth it is just cosmetics, seems to me. If you have a penalty, does it reduce skills prof? If not 8 Int dump stat is still a thing. Do you see someone building a character dropping say a 14 con to 10 to raise a 10 int to 14 in order to get 8 proficiencies instead of 6 at first level? Any character can start with at least 6 ptofivirnces in skills+tools, some more. Two more is not that big compared to moving a +2 worth of bonus from a stat they will use. This seems to be going to accomplish two things to me... Move wizards into having more skills, plus any others who already have reason to spin higher INT. Its rewarding more those who already emphasize INT for [I]other reasons[/I]. In a few cases push other dump stats - maybe put 8 in STR instead of INT for more dex skills for your agile fighter? Ard you better off just sliding dump stats around ? In my experience, in actual play, wizards dont need "more" - they do well in and out of combat and work very well in all pillars. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Underpowered INT solution - Bonus Skill Proficiencies for high INT
Top