Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Understanding the Edition Wars (and other heated arguments)
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Celebrim" data-source="post: 5721700" data-attributes="member: 4937"><p>So? Maybe they are passionate because they are actually right? Or maybe they are passionate because they are the best informed? Or maybe they are passionate because there is something tangible at stake for them if in a larger sense, there 'side' loses the argument. </p><p></p><p>To keep this in inoffensive terms, perhaps the issue is Coke vs. Pepsi. The Coke lovers are facing a situation where if there voice doesn't get heard, not only will Coke potentially become harder to find than the unpalatable Pepsi, but the producer of Coke may feel the need to concede the argument by producing a New Coke which is actually a Pepsi knock off. This memetic war then actually has stakes. Now, if you are a person who can't tell the difference between Coke and Pepsi by taste, or who doesn't like Cola anyway (you only drink Dr. Pepper), or who doesn't really care - all this passionate protesting of New Coke and all these passionate attempts to extol the virtues of classic Coke over New Coke may seem like so much silliness you you. But there is for many people something real and a tangible cost to their happiness involved by just conceding the argument and trying to learn to like New Coke.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I'm claiming that in most cases its not only difficult, but impossible. If it was merely difficult, you'd have no objection from me. But I by no means assume that "difficult" is anything but the very best case scenario. </p><p></p><p>I'd also like to note that "we might benefit from many minds working together" is an appeal to the "man power fallacy" I mentioned earlier. We might. We might not however.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Which again, is exactly like I said, the whiff of implying that anyone disagreeing with you - those passionate people arguing vociferously for their beliefs - are irrational and you represent the reasoned position. What makes you so certain that the they haven't completed the analysis that you are only calling for? Maybe they have actually done the analysis already, and its the conclusion of that analysis that is driving their passion.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Celebrim, post: 5721700, member: 4937"] So? Maybe they are passionate because they are actually right? Or maybe they are passionate because they are the best informed? Or maybe they are passionate because there is something tangible at stake for them if in a larger sense, there 'side' loses the argument. To keep this in inoffensive terms, perhaps the issue is Coke vs. Pepsi. The Coke lovers are facing a situation where if there voice doesn't get heard, not only will Coke potentially become harder to find than the unpalatable Pepsi, but the producer of Coke may feel the need to concede the argument by producing a New Coke which is actually a Pepsi knock off. This memetic war then actually has stakes. Now, if you are a person who can't tell the difference between Coke and Pepsi by taste, or who doesn't like Cola anyway (you only drink Dr. Pepper), or who doesn't really care - all this passionate protesting of New Coke and all these passionate attempts to extol the virtues of classic Coke over New Coke may seem like so much silliness you you. But there is for many people something real and a tangible cost to their happiness involved by just conceding the argument and trying to learn to like New Coke. I'm claiming that in most cases its not only difficult, but impossible. If it was merely difficult, you'd have no objection from me. But I by no means assume that "difficult" is anything but the very best case scenario. I'd also like to note that "we might benefit from many minds working together" is an appeal to the "man power fallacy" I mentioned earlier. We might. We might not however. Which again, is exactly like I said, the whiff of implying that anyone disagreeing with you - those passionate people arguing vociferously for their beliefs - are irrational and you represent the reasoned position. What makes you so certain that the they haven't completed the analysis that you are only calling for? Maybe they have actually done the analysis already, and its the conclusion of that analysis that is driving their passion. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Understanding the Edition Wars (and other heated arguments)
Top