Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Unearthed Arcana: 16 New Feats
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Levistus's_Leviathan" data-source="post: 8036929" data-attributes="member: 7023887"><p>Okay, here's my full reviews: </p><p></p><p><strong>Artificer Initiate:</strong> It's like Magic Initiate, but better! Also, you still get to take Magic Initiate! I like this feat, but think it will be nerfed (I also second the idea for an Artificer Infusion as a feat). This is a great feat for artificers, wizards, and good for the 1/3rd casters.</p><p></p><p><strong>Chef</strong>: Good, I guess. I mean, I'd never take it, or encourage a player to take it really, but I could see situations where this would be very useful. I would prefer it as an Artificer (maybe bard or cleric subclass if it has to be), but this feat can stay. I think there should be some pre-requisite, based on needing healing spells or something, as it doesn't make much sense for a Wizard to have it, or an Archfiend Warlock. (Great feat for clerics, bards, druids that focus on goodberry, and alchemist artificers) </p><p></p><p><strong>Crusher</strong>: I like the feat. Some people have expressed concern about the name, but I think it fits. This is a good feat, and fits well with the other weapon-damage focused ones (This feat is great with Monks). </p><p></p><p><strong>Eldritch Adept</strong>: Nice feat. I always wanted more invocations as my Hexblade, and this would be nice. This will be very popular if it makes it into the book as is (The infinite mage armor or false life will be very attractive for Sorcerers and Wizards).</p><p></p><p><strong>Fey Touched</strong>: Good feat. I'm sure a lot of Archfey warlocks will take this, as well as certain wizards and bards. </p><p></p><p><strong>Fighting Initiate</strong>: Great feat. Some have mentioned Rogues getting Archery or Two-Weapon Fighting, and others have mentioned Barbarians getting a Fighting Style. I think a lot of people will take this, either to get more Fighting Styles as a Fighter, Paladin, or Ranger, or for a Hexblade or Bladesinger to get a fighting style. </p><p></p><p><strong>Gunner</strong>: Besides firearms being broken, this making them even worse, and it being an amazing feat if you want to be a gun-user (especially as a Battlesmith Artificer or Battlemaster Fighter). </p><p></p><p><strong>Metamagic Adept</strong>: Also, besides screwing the sorcerer even more (and helping it as well) it seems like a good feat. This will be a very attractive feat to people arcane casters, which they needed more of.</p><p></p><p><strong>Piercer</strong>: Nice feat, like the Crusher feat. This is useful to archers, gun-users, cavaliers, rogues, and many more subclasses. </p><p></p><p><strong>Poisoner</strong>: I mean, poisons do need help. Good feat, not much else to say. </p><p></p><p><strong>Practiced Expert</strong>: I really hated that Prodigy was limited to humans, half-orcs, and half-elves. I mean, what the heck? Only people with human blood, rogues, and bards can be very, very good at a few certain things? If allowed, I will take this as every single character I play in the future. My changeling hexblade needs this for Deception, a Wizard needs this for Arcana, a Paladin needs it for Persuasion, Athletics, or Intimidation. </p><p></p><p><strong>Shadow Touched</strong>: Good feat, except for the subclass it fits with the most: Shadow Sorcerers. They already get <a href="https://www.dndbeyond.com/spells/darkness" target="_blank">darkness</a>, and I think you should be able to choose a different necrotic/illusion spell for this, like Blindness/Deafness or Ray of Sickness. </p><p></p><p><strong>Shield Training</strong>: I mean, amazing feat. I would literally never not take this as a non-gish spellcaster without shields. It's even useful to gish spellcasters, and non-spellcasters. War Wizards would have great ACs with this, especially Hobgoblins with light armor. </p><p></p><p><strong>Slasher</strong>: Good feat. Not much else to say, except slashing-sword users will have a great time with this feat. </p><p></p><p><strong>Tandem Tactician</strong>: Good feat. People have been saying it screws the Mastermind, but not really. They still have a range of 30 feet for their abilities. </p><p></p><p><strong>Tracker</strong>: Great feat. I would take it as a Ranger, but it does feel like another feat to make a class not feel needed anymore (Take this as a monk. You get the most attacks at lower levels, and will benefit the most from this).</p><p></p><p>Summary: </p><p></p><p>I like these feats in general. I see the problems with them, and expect several of these to be dropped/changed before entering Xanathar's 2.0. They are all good, all useful to most characters, and let me steal abilities from other classes without having to do all the multiclassing nonsense.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Levistus's_Leviathan, post: 8036929, member: 7023887"] Okay, here's my full reviews: [B]Artificer Initiate:[/B] It's like Magic Initiate, but better! Also, you still get to take Magic Initiate! I like this feat, but think it will be nerfed (I also second the idea for an Artificer Infusion as a feat). This is a great feat for artificers, wizards, and good for the 1/3rd casters. [B]Chef[/B]: Good, I guess. I mean, I'd never take it, or encourage a player to take it really, but I could see situations where this would be very useful. I would prefer it as an Artificer (maybe bard or cleric subclass if it has to be), but this feat can stay. I think there should be some pre-requisite, based on needing healing spells or something, as it doesn't make much sense for a Wizard to have it, or an Archfiend Warlock. (Great feat for clerics, bards, druids that focus on goodberry, and alchemist artificers) [B]Crusher[/B]: I like the feat. Some people have expressed concern about the name, but I think it fits. This is a good feat, and fits well with the other weapon-damage focused ones (This feat is great with Monks). [B]Eldritch Adept[/B]: Nice feat. I always wanted more invocations as my Hexblade, and this would be nice. This will be very popular if it makes it into the book as is (The infinite mage armor or false life will be very attractive for Sorcerers and Wizards). [B]Fey Touched[/B]: Good feat. I'm sure a lot of Archfey warlocks will take this, as well as certain wizards and bards. [B]Fighting Initiate[/B]: Great feat. Some have mentioned Rogues getting Archery or Two-Weapon Fighting, and others have mentioned Barbarians getting a Fighting Style. I think a lot of people will take this, either to get more Fighting Styles as a Fighter, Paladin, or Ranger, or for a Hexblade or Bladesinger to get a fighting style. [B]Gunner[/B]: Besides firearms being broken, this making them even worse, and it being an amazing feat if you want to be a gun-user (especially as a Battlesmith Artificer or Battlemaster Fighter). [B]Metamagic Adept[/B]: Also, besides screwing the sorcerer even more (and helping it as well) it seems like a good feat. This will be a very attractive feat to people arcane casters, which they needed more of. [B]Piercer[/B]: Nice feat, like the Crusher feat. This is useful to archers, gun-users, cavaliers, rogues, and many more subclasses. [B]Poisoner[/B]: I mean, poisons do need help. Good feat, not much else to say. [B]Practiced Expert[/B]: I really hated that Prodigy was limited to humans, half-orcs, and half-elves. I mean, what the heck? Only people with human blood, rogues, and bards can be very, very good at a few certain things? If allowed, I will take this as every single character I play in the future. My changeling hexblade needs this for Deception, a Wizard needs this for Arcana, a Paladin needs it for Persuasion, Athletics, or Intimidation. [B]Shadow Touched[/B]: Good feat, except for the subclass it fits with the most: Shadow Sorcerers. They already get [URL='https://www.dndbeyond.com/spells/darkness']darkness[/URL], and I think you should be able to choose a different necrotic/illusion spell for this, like Blindness/Deafness or Ray of Sickness. [B]Shield Training[/B]: I mean, amazing feat. I would literally never not take this as a non-gish spellcaster without shields. It's even useful to gish spellcasters, and non-spellcasters. War Wizards would have great ACs with this, especially Hobgoblins with light armor. [B]Slasher[/B]: Good feat. Not much else to say, except slashing-sword users will have a great time with this feat. [B]Tandem Tactician[/B]: Good feat. People have been saying it screws the Mastermind, but not really. They still have a range of 30 feet for their abilities. [B]Tracker[/B]: Great feat. I would take it as a Ranger, but it does feel like another feat to make a class not feel needed anymore (Take this as a monk. You get the most attacks at lower levels, and will benefit the most from this). Summary: I like these feats in general. I see the problems with them, and expect several of these to be dropped/changed before entering Xanathar's 2.0. They are all good, all useful to most characters, and let me steal abilities from other classes without having to do all the multiclassing nonsense. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Unearthed Arcana: 16 New Feats
Top