Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Paul Farquhar" data-source="post: 8038604" data-attributes="member: 6906155">I'd noted that, but, as you say, warcaster is still probably better. Good for ATs though (and anyone else who doesn't want to juggle between a melee weapon and spells).Really, I'm a bit uncomfortable with this feat in terms of lore. It's really one that is going to appeal to spellcasters rather than warriors. And, unlike clerics and paladins, it works with any shield. How? Why? what makes shields good for casting spells with? Can I rip the door off a taxi and cast a spell with it?I would feel happier if is said something like "if you have the spellcasting focus class ability you can inscribe a mystic rune on your shield using 10gp in materials that allows you to use it as a spellcasting focus".And add a different feat that enables "use your weapon as a spell casting focus" as part of it's function.Addendum: Alternative class feature (Fighter):Fighting Style: Battle Magic. You learn two cantrips from the Wizard list. Intelligence is your casting Stat. You can use a weapon as your spellcasting focus.</blockquote>