Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Sacrosanct" data-source="post: 8251736" data-attributes="member: 15700">I literally showed you the actual passage from Moldvay's basic (that you originally cited) that does not say what you think it does, and yet you keep making these claims.  I don't know what to tell you at this point.  Of course it  must seem like you're right when you ignore all the evidence that shows you're wrong. <img class="smilie smilie--emoji" alt="🤷‍♂️" src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f937-2642.png" title="Man shrugging    :man_shrugging:" data-shortname=":man_shrugging:" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" />  The weird thing is why you're so adamant to repeat false assumptions after the evidence shows the contrary.  Also, it seems like you're bouncing your timelines all over the place.  Citing 1989 as proof they were always that way when they weren't prior to that, then throwing in 1977 when it doesn't say what you're wanting it to say?  I dunno, makes no coherent argument.It's entirely reasonable for someone to look at a kobold, see it has nipples, and read the description, which says they are dog-like with scaly skin (not reptilian anywhere in that description), and think they are more mammal like than reptile.  You didn't.  Good for you.  Entirely reasonable.  But why you're so hard on telling others who did think that, that they are wrong, makes no sense when looking at how they were actually described.</blockquote>

Verification