Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
NOW LIVE! Today's the day you meet your new best friend. You don’t have to leave Wolfy behind... In 'Pets & Sidekicks' your companions level up with you!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Unearthed Arcana: Gothic Lineages & New Race/Culture Distinction
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Scribe" data-source="post: 8181453" data-attributes="member: 6807152"><p>Honestly this is my only issue (because it cannot just be ignored) with the Tasha system.</p><p></p><p>If these new races/lineages, whatever you want to call them only get a 'do whatever +2/+1' there is no option here. There is only the Tasha system.</p><p></p><p>For people who do not want that, it is absolutely not just an alternative system. I mean the PDF makes it clear.</p><p></p><p>"Following in that book’s footsteps, the race options in this article and in future D&D books lack the Ability Score Increase trait..."</p><p></p><p>So yeah, people who want the restrictions and the system as it has been for however many years/decades, dont get that anymore. Instead you get +2/+1, flat, grey, generic.</p><p></p><p>As [USER=83242]@dave2008[/USER] mentioned, go ahead and make +2/+1 the default, I do not care whatsoever, but unless they also provide the restriction system used previously, its not like we gain anything, we simply lose another layer of the game.</p><p></p><p>They got too much push back against Tasha's being an 'option' (when every game can do whatever the DM wants anyway!) and now we lose the system we have had forever*.</p><p></p><p>Thanks WotC, I hate it.</p><p></p><p>* I dont know if it was like that in 1e, but I'm going to say forever anyway.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Scribe, post: 8181453, member: 6807152"] Honestly this is my only issue (because it cannot just be ignored) with the Tasha system. If these new races/lineages, whatever you want to call them only get a 'do whatever +2/+1' there is no option here. There is only the Tasha system. For people who do not want that, it is absolutely not just an alternative system. I mean the PDF makes it clear. "Following in that book’s footsteps, the race options in this article and in future D&D books lack the Ability Score Increase trait..." So yeah, people who want the restrictions and the system as it has been for however many years/decades, dont get that anymore. Instead you get +2/+1, flat, grey, generic. As [USER=83242]@dave2008[/USER] mentioned, go ahead and make +2/+1 the default, I do not care whatsoever, but unless they also provide the restriction system used previously, its not like we gain anything, we simply lose another layer of the game. They got too much push back against Tasha's being an 'option' (when every game can do whatever the DM wants anyway!) and now we lose the system we have had forever*. Thanks WotC, I hate it. * I dont know if it was like that in 1e, but I'm going to say forever anyway. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Unearthed Arcana: Gothic Lineages & New Race/Culture Distinction
Top