Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Next
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
Twitch
YouTube
Facebook (EN Publishing)
Facebook (EN World)
Twitter
Instagram
TikTok
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
The
VOIDRUNNER'S CODEX
is coming! Explore new worlds, fight oppressive empires, fend off fearsome aliens, and wield deadly psionics with this comprehensive boxed set expansion for 5E and A5E!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Unearthed Arcana: Gothic Lineages & New Race/Culture Distinction
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="TrickyDUK2" data-source="post: 8183008" data-attributes="member: 7028514"><p>Again, I agree. For me this change is not about racial sensitivity or necessarily making the game better. In this case, ‘better‘ would be more about whether a particular player feels that this change means they have more authority to create a character that is no longer restricted by fixed ASIs. But for me, this was never an issue. If a player wanted to move the ASIs around and they provided a compelling reason, I would simply allow it as DM (noting that 5e tries to give the DM more freedom to make the game theirs).</p><p></p><p>But what about the player that wants to have ASIs determined for him, whether that’s a player who just can’t choose (for whatever reason) or a DM that relies on having specific rules to help with a sense of structure within his game?</p><p></p><p>EDIT: If we are treating the racial sensitivity as a separate issue, then I do argue that removing something that some people want cannot universally make the game better.</p><p></p><p>I guess that would lead me to suggest that this should simply be an option in the DMG - don‘t like fixed ASIs, here are ways to remove them. Or, remove them in the PHB and in DMG and specific settings, say here are some suggested ASIs for races.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="TrickyDUK2, post: 8183008, member: 7028514"] Again, I agree. For me this change is not about racial sensitivity or necessarily making the game better. In this case, ‘better‘ would be more about whether a particular player feels that this change means they have more authority to create a character that is no longer restricted by fixed ASIs. But for me, this was never an issue. If a player wanted to move the ASIs around and they provided a compelling reason, I would simply allow it as DM (noting that 5e tries to give the DM more freedom to make the game theirs). But what about the player that wants to have ASIs determined for him, whether that’s a player who just can’t choose (for whatever reason) or a DM that relies on having specific rules to help with a sense of structure within his game? EDIT: If we are treating the racial sensitivity as a separate issue, then I do argue that removing something that some people want cannot universally make the game better. I guess that would lead me to suggest that this should simply be an option in the DMG - don‘t like fixed ASIs, here are ways to remove them. Or, remove them in the PHB and in DMG and specific settings, say here are some suggested ASIs for races. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Unearthed Arcana: Gothic Lineages & New Race/Culture Distinction
Top