Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
NOW LIVE! Today's the day you meet your new best friend. You don’t have to leave Wolfy behind... In 'Pets & Sidekicks' your companions level up with you!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Unearthed Arcana: Gothic Lineages & New Race/Culture Distinction
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="DEFCON 1" data-source="post: 8183071" data-attributes="member: 7006"><p>What amuses me the most about seeing you post this (and I give you props for it) is that this is exactly what you <em>should</em> be doing... deciding that what is in the books are not sufficient for your personal needs and coming up with your own alternate method. Which is exactly what everybody else should be doing as well.</p><p></p><p>Despite some other poster's protestations... WotC's books going forward <em>do not</em> actually have to include a secondary listing of a "default" choice of where the +2/+1 lies for those that feel like they need it (in addition to the new decision of choose any ability scores for them)... because they, as their own thinking DM, can just decide when setting up their next campaign to choose which ability scores get them for themselves and tell the players this is how it will be for this upcoming game.</p><p></p><p>This once again highlights something I've been trying to get across to everybody for years now... which is that the <em>entire game is optional</em>-- trying to insist on playing "Rules As Written" is unnecessary and a waste of time-- and none of you get brownie points or a pat on the back or a Good Job! from ANYONE if you try and do so. Nobody cares if you play RAW or don't play RAW. You are striving for some ideal that that only matters to yourself in this bizarre narrative you have written about how you should play D&D. But it doesn't matter. It never has. So by extension... getting so up in arms with WotC that they keep making new rules that will "force" you to NOT play RAW just so you can play the game with the rules you want is <em>ridiculous</em>.</p><p></p><p>Oh darn... you're going to have to tell your players that in this next campaign that if they want to play a Hexborn, that lineage gets a +2 CON / +1 CHA... despite the fact that in the written pages it says put them wherever your want. You've decide that for this upcoming game, it's CON/CHA.</p><p></p><p>And there you go. That's all you need to do. You get what you want, and you didn't need WotC to "write it down for you". Because WotC realizes just the like a lot of the rest of us that they don't need to write all these little micro-rules down because there's absolutely no reason to waste the ink when you as a player of D&D are meant to do this on your own if you really think it <em>that important</em> to your enjoyment of the game. So do it. And then have fun.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="DEFCON 1, post: 8183071, member: 7006"] What amuses me the most about seeing you post this (and I give you props for it) is that this is exactly what you [I]should[/I] be doing... deciding that what is in the books are not sufficient for your personal needs and coming up with your own alternate method. Which is exactly what everybody else should be doing as well. Despite some other poster's protestations... WotC's books going forward [I]do not[/I] actually have to include a secondary listing of a "default" choice of where the +2/+1 lies for those that feel like they need it (in addition to the new decision of choose any ability scores for them)... because they, as their own thinking DM, can just decide when setting up their next campaign to choose which ability scores get them for themselves and tell the players this is how it will be for this upcoming game. This once again highlights something I've been trying to get across to everybody for years now... which is that the [I]entire game is optional[/I]-- trying to insist on playing "Rules As Written" is unnecessary and a waste of time-- and none of you get brownie points or a pat on the back or a Good Job! from ANYONE if you try and do so. Nobody cares if you play RAW or don't play RAW. You are striving for some ideal that that only matters to yourself in this bizarre narrative you have written about how you should play D&D. But it doesn't matter. It never has. So by extension... getting so up in arms with WotC that they keep making new rules that will "force" you to NOT play RAW just so you can play the game with the rules you want is [I]ridiculous[/I]. Oh darn... you're going to have to tell your players that in this next campaign that if they want to play a Hexborn, that lineage gets a +2 CON / +1 CHA... despite the fact that in the written pages it says put them wherever your want. You've decide that for this upcoming game, it's CON/CHA. And there you go. That's all you need to do. You get what you want, and you didn't need WotC to "write it down for you". Because WotC realizes just the like a lot of the rest of us that they don't need to write all these little micro-rules down because there's absolutely no reason to waste the ink when you as a player of D&D are meant to do this on your own if you really think it [I]that important[/I] to your enjoyment of the game. So do it. And then have fun. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Unearthed Arcana: Gothic Lineages & New Race/Culture Distinction
Top