Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Unearthed Arcana: Gothic Lineages & New Race/Culture Distinction
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Chaosmancer" data-source="post: 8186147" data-attributes="member: 6801228"><p>You are claiming a flaw but a flaw in what? </p><p></p><p>They have stated that new lineages going forward will use this method. But I don't think it is even a stretch to say that they were talking solely about new lineages going forward in fifth edition. The 40 races already printed are printed under the system you want. It took them five and a half years to get to this point. That means that if they released these lineages at the same rate (which they likely won't because many of these races were released early on in the cycle) it would take them until 2027 to have a 50/50 split. </p><p></p><p>If we assume 6e comes out in 2024, then your system will still be the majority option by that time. And then we only have supposition that maybe they will go forward with an entirely new style of race for 6e. Based on a single early playtest of a concept for 5e. That is a massive jump man.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>But a dream eater style hungry ghost, defined by high intelligence and insight into people (+2/+1 Int/Wis) is a concept you cut completely out by saying that I must be one of strong, fast, tough or charming. </p><p></p><p>What I think you are missing is that each of these concepts was designed so broadly that they could have any combination of scores. Not only because they can be any race, but because their nature can be nearly anything as well. </p><p></p><p>Let us shift from the Damphir for a moment and look at the Hexblood. Fey magic could manifest as</p><p></p><p>The Hag, Korred, or Red Cap's unnatural strength -> STR</p><p>The Quickling or Sprites speed -> Dex</p><p>The powerful life of nature or treants -> Con</p><p>The connection to the wilds or discerning eye of sprites -> Wis</p><p>The intelligence of Hags or other powerful fey -> Int</p><p>Fey Charm -> Cha</p><p></p><p>Also, part of a Hexblood could have been seeking a boon, perhaps the drank a potion that a hag prepared that altered their body to give them increased X. OR they bathed in a magic spring. Or they ate fruit from the Fey Wild. Or they were blessed by three fairy godmothers. </p><p></p><p>How do you limit a concept that broad down to two scores? Why would you bother to do so? Their breadth is part of their appeal as a catch all idea.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Chaosmancer, post: 8186147, member: 6801228"] You are claiming a flaw but a flaw in what? They have stated that new lineages going forward will use this method. But I don't think it is even a stretch to say that they were talking solely about new lineages going forward in fifth edition. The 40 races already printed are printed under the system you want. It took them five and a half years to get to this point. That means that if they released these lineages at the same rate (which they likely won't because many of these races were released early on in the cycle) it would take them until 2027 to have a 50/50 split. If we assume 6e comes out in 2024, then your system will still be the majority option by that time. And then we only have supposition that maybe they will go forward with an entirely new style of race for 6e. Based on a single early playtest of a concept for 5e. That is a massive jump man. But a dream eater style hungry ghost, defined by high intelligence and insight into people (+2/+1 Int/Wis) is a concept you cut completely out by saying that I must be one of strong, fast, tough or charming. What I think you are missing is that each of these concepts was designed so broadly that they could have any combination of scores. Not only because they can be any race, but because their nature can be nearly anything as well. Let us shift from the Damphir for a moment and look at the Hexblood. Fey magic could manifest as The Hag, Korred, or Red Cap's unnatural strength -> STR The Quickling or Sprites speed -> Dex The powerful life of nature or treants -> Con The connection to the wilds or discerning eye of sprites -> Wis The intelligence of Hags or other powerful fey -> Int Fey Charm -> Cha Also, part of a Hexblood could have been seeking a boon, perhaps the drank a potion that a hag prepared that altered their body to give them increased X. OR they bathed in a magic spring. Or they ate fruit from the Fey Wild. Or they were blessed by three fairy godmothers. How do you limit a concept that broad down to two scores? Why would you bother to do so? Their breadth is part of their appeal as a catch all idea. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Unearthed Arcana: Gothic Lineages & New Race/Culture Distinction
Top