Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Unearthed Arcana: Gothic Lineages & New Race/Culture Distinction
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Arial Black" data-source="post: 8190186" data-attributes="member: 6799649"><p>I beg to differ.</p><p></p><p>And I would've gone the other way. I would have set the cap at 20+racial modifier.</p><p></p><p>And even as it is. it does affect first level. I've no problem with high level PCs getting higher stats, because every high level PC is going to get access to amazing abilities. But they have to earn it. They shouldn't be able to just claim to be stronger than a goliath at 1st level, any more than they should be able to choose to be the best fighter or best wizard in the world at 1st level. ALL these things should be earned by levelling up.</p><p></p><p>According to the PHB p175: "Strength measures bodily power, athletic training, and the extent to which you can exert raw physical force." So, a.) it is NOT <em>just</em> the extra damage they do with weapons, and b.) having high Dex (which halflings have) affects damage just as much as Str.</p><p></p><p>In the game Stormbringer (1980), and the Chaosium rules upon which they were based (RuneQuest), the Strength attribute described the <em>proportional</em> strength, and was combined with the Size attribute to see how much extra damage a creature dealt.</p><p></p><p>But that is definitely NOT the case with D&D 5e, or with any version of D&D.</p><p></p><p>We can test this! Let's go to the 5e Monster Manual and look up the entries for Elephant and Rat (since mice don't have an entry). If Str is absolute in 5e, elephants will be stronger than rats. But if Str is relative in 5e, rats will be stronger than elephants.</p><p></p><p>Let's have a look:-</p><p></p><p>Elephant (p322): Str 22</p><p></p><p>Rat (p335): Str 2</p><p></p><p>Conclusion: in D&D, strength is absolute, NOT proportionate.</p><p> </p><p></p><p>As mentioned above, in D&D the Strength ability score is a combination of several things, and lifting power is but one of them. Yes, there are ways to increase that aspect individually (like the Powerful Build trait), just like there are ways to increase athletic training individually (the Athletics skill, the Athlete feat). But they ALL are <em>modifiers</em> to their <em>actual</em> Strength score.</p><p></p><p>I do not see the Race modifications to only apply to the six PCs in the world! I think that is disingenuous. Those game mechanics apply to all members of that race, unless further rules say otherwise.</p><p></p><p>When we want to know what a race is like compared to humans, we look at what the racial modifiers are in addition to their traits. </p><p></p><p>And if you want to be a weak example of a goliath or a strong example of a halfling, we simulate that by applying our six rolled (or assigned or bought) scores to whatever abilities we want. So putting your 18 (or 15, whichever is your best) in Strength really does make you a steroid-using halfling, stronger than the <em>average</em> goliath (12.5) and in a great position to get even stronger <strong>with experience</strong>, which is how the game works!</p><p></p><p>Which is why you can assign a big score to Strength if you want. But at least the strongest 1st level goliath will be stronger than the strongest 1st level halfling, and the world still makes sense!</p><p></p><p>A few days ago I posted that our new campaign will have a houserule that any race with a +2 racial modifier to any particular ability score may, at character creation, swap that +2 for any feat for which they qualify, unless that race already gives floating bonuses to ability scores. The upshot is that every single race can have that essential(!) +3 modifier to their prime stat at level 1 (if they choose the right half feat). It also widens the availability of feats at 1st level, while still leaving the set bonuses for the race as a whole so the world still makes sense.</p><p></p><p>I said I'd share the results of this houserule on the character creation of our group.</p><p></p><p>I had already developed a character idea as a variant human, and this new rule did not tempt me to change that concept.</p><p></p><p>Out of the other five players, one chose a variant human, one chose a non-variant human, one chose a half-elf (so the new rule had no effect on them), one chose a variant tiefling from Mordenkainen's (Glasya) but since they are also a sorcerer they chose to keep their racial +2 to Charisma, and the last is playing a dragonborn fighter and chose to keep their racial +2 Strength.</p><p></p><p>In the end, no-one took advantage of this houserule.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Arial Black, post: 8190186, member: 6799649"] I beg to differ. And I would've gone the other way. I would have set the cap at 20+racial modifier. And even as it is. it does affect first level. I've no problem with high level PCs getting higher stats, because every high level PC is going to get access to amazing abilities. But they have to earn it. They shouldn't be able to just claim to be stronger than a goliath at 1st level, any more than they should be able to choose to be the best fighter or best wizard in the world at 1st level. ALL these things should be earned by levelling up. According to the PHB p175: "Strength measures bodily power, athletic training, and the extent to which you can exert raw physical force." So, a.) it is NOT [I]just[/I] the extra damage they do with weapons, and b.) having high Dex (which halflings have) affects damage just as much as Str. In the game Stormbringer (1980), and the Chaosium rules upon which they were based (RuneQuest), the Strength attribute described the [I]proportional[/I] strength, and was combined with the Size attribute to see how much extra damage a creature dealt. But that is definitely NOT the case with D&D 5e, or with any version of D&D. We can test this! Let's go to the 5e Monster Manual and look up the entries for Elephant and Rat (since mice don't have an entry). If Str is absolute in 5e, elephants will be stronger than rats. But if Str is relative in 5e, rats will be stronger than elephants. Let's have a look:- Elephant (p322): Str 22 Rat (p335): Str 2 Conclusion: in D&D, strength is absolute, NOT proportionate. As mentioned above, in D&D the Strength ability score is a combination of several things, and lifting power is but one of them. Yes, there are ways to increase that aspect individually (like the Powerful Build trait), just like there are ways to increase athletic training individually (the Athletics skill, the Athlete feat). But they ALL are [I]modifiers[/I] to their [I]actual[/I] Strength score. I do not see the Race modifications to only apply to the six PCs in the world! I think that is disingenuous. Those game mechanics apply to all members of that race, unless further rules say otherwise. When we want to know what a race is like compared to humans, we look at what the racial modifiers are in addition to their traits. And if you want to be a weak example of a goliath or a strong example of a halfling, we simulate that by applying our six rolled (or assigned or bought) scores to whatever abilities we want. So putting your 18 (or 15, whichever is your best) in Strength really does make you a steroid-using halfling, stronger than the [I]average[/I] goliath (12.5) and in a great position to get even stronger [B]with experience[/B], which is how the game works! Which is why you can assign a big score to Strength if you want. But at least the strongest 1st level goliath will be stronger than the strongest 1st level halfling, and the world still makes sense! A few days ago I posted that our new campaign will have a houserule that any race with a +2 racial modifier to any particular ability score may, at character creation, swap that +2 for any feat for which they qualify, unless that race already gives floating bonuses to ability scores. The upshot is that every single race can have that essential(!) +3 modifier to their prime stat at level 1 (if they choose the right half feat). It also widens the availability of feats at 1st level, while still leaving the set bonuses for the race as a whole so the world still makes sense. I said I'd share the results of this houserule on the character creation of our group. I had already developed a character idea as a variant human, and this new rule did not tempt me to change that concept. Out of the other five players, one chose a variant human, one chose a non-variant human, one chose a half-elf (so the new rule had no effect on them), one chose a variant tiefling from Mordenkainen's (Glasya) but since they are also a sorcerer they chose to keep their racial +2 to Charisma, and the last is playing a dragonborn fighter and chose to keep their racial +2 Strength. In the end, no-one took advantage of this houserule. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Unearthed Arcana: Gothic Lineages & New Race/Culture Distinction
Top