Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Scribe" data-source="post: 8190634" data-attributes="member: 6807152">[ATTACH=full]132275[/ATTACH]I'll get back to you on that. Could be a bit of wait, but we can circle back on this later. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile    :)"  data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" />What argument? Seriously. In a world in which Tasha's is even presented as the DEFAULT, what argument can be made against maintaining the system 5e was sold under as an option going forward?Its not a mechanical argument.Its not something that they could not do, as they have for the life of the product.Its not a lore argument AT ALL.Its not an argument about forcing a choice at your table or mine.What is the argument for denying an option, which has previously been seen as the default, or primary official option since release.There isnt one. Its not a mechanical issue, its not a lore issue, its not a printed rules issue. So what is it?Only one side in any discussion I've had here, has said 1 option has to be removed, and its not me.So why?</blockquote>