Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Unearthed Arcana: Gothic Lineages & New Race/Culture Distinction
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Cap'n Kobold" data-source="post: 8197170" data-attributes="member: 6802951"><p>So here, you appear to be claiming that 15 in a stat isn't extraordinary.</p><p></p><p></p><p>And here you are saying that it is.</p><p></p><p>Do you think that there is a <em>chance </em>that you might have misrepresented the people in the first statement and the ones similar to it?</p><p></p><p></p><p>What on earth makes you claim that?</p><p></p><p></p><p>There is nothing wrong with that. It is a good justification for putting your high roll or score into that ability.</p><p>Claiming that the character is non-viable without an additional +2 to whatever you rolled/assigned to that ability is what distinguishes the optimiser.</p><p></p><p></p><p>That is <em>not</em> what you said that people have said.</p><p></p><p></p><p><em>This</em> is what you said. What you claimed that people here were saying.</p><p>Now, if, in fact there <em>aren't </em>people claiming that it should be literally impossible for any halfling to be stronger than average, them it would appear that your earlier post where you claimed there were was a fabrication and you may owe them an apology.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I've no issue with a being approaching demigod status that has specialised in doing something really well, can regularly achieve feats that a commoner would view as impossible.</p><p></p><p></p><p>Bear in mind that in most situations, a PC could achieve that average task without needing a roll. Only in situations that the DM deems are stressful enough to require a roll is there a 50%/55% chance of failure.</p><p></p><p></p><p>I've got no issue with you not feeling happy playing a character that can't meet any particular qualification you choose to set. - Your requirements for enjoyment are your own personal business.</p><p>And I fully accept that a character with a 15 in an ability score is going to be slightly worse at things governed by it than a character with a 16. Just as that character with a 16 is going to be worse at those things by the one with an 18 in it.</p><p></p><p>What I <em>am </em>objecting to is the claim that the character with the 15 "sucks", or isn't viable, or that someone with an effective 15 in a stat isn't strong, or bright or whatever. <em>That </em>is rank elitism, whether you're claiming it on an internet board, telling a new player that when you see their character, or saying the equivalent to someone in a non-D&D context.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Cap'n Kobold, post: 8197170, member: 6802951"] So here, you appear to be claiming that 15 in a stat isn't extraordinary. And here you are saying that it is. Do you think that there is a [I]chance [/I]that you might have misrepresented the people in the first statement and the ones similar to it? What on earth makes you claim that? There is nothing wrong with that. It is a good justification for putting your high roll or score into that ability. Claiming that the character is non-viable without an additional +2 to whatever you rolled/assigned to that ability is what distinguishes the optimiser. That is [I]not[/I] what you said that people have said. [I]This[/I] is what you said. What you claimed that people here were saying. Now, if, in fact there [I]aren't [/I]people claiming that it should be literally impossible for any halfling to be stronger than average, them it would appear that your earlier post where you claimed there were was a fabrication and you may owe them an apology. I've no issue with a being approaching demigod status that has specialised in doing something really well, can regularly achieve feats that a commoner would view as impossible. Bear in mind that in most situations, a PC could achieve that average task without needing a roll. Only in situations that the DM deems are stressful enough to require a roll is there a 50%/55% chance of failure. I've got no issue with you not feeling happy playing a character that can't meet any particular qualification you choose to set. - Your requirements for enjoyment are your own personal business. And I fully accept that a character with a 15 in an ability score is going to be slightly worse at things governed by it than a character with a 16. Just as that character with a 16 is going to be worse at those things by the one with an 18 in it. What I [I]am [/I]objecting to is the claim that the character with the 15 "sucks", or isn't viable, or that someone with an effective 15 in a stat isn't strong, or bright or whatever. [I]That [/I]is rank elitism, whether you're claiming it on an internet board, telling a new player that when you see their character, or saying the equivalent to someone in a non-D&D context. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Unearthed Arcana: Gothic Lineages & New Race/Culture Distinction
Top