Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Unearthed Arcana: Gothic Lineages & New Race/Culture Distinction
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Chaosmancer" data-source="post: 8203492" data-attributes="member: 6801228"><p>If you "can" modify them, then you don't have to. Meaning that you do not have to apply PC elf abilities to an Elf to make them an elf. So, how can you sit there and argue that you don't have to apply racial ASIs to an NPC for them to be an NPC of that race, but then also say that you must apply Racial ASIs to every member of the race? You are talking out of both sides of your mouth. </p><p></p><p>And again, you want to focus on Racial Feats. Why? Literally, you are the only one who keeps trying to have this discussion, and you somehow also feel like taking away ASIs means taking away all racial traits. </p><p></p><p>What makes a Lightfoot halfling different than a Forest Gnome? </p><p></p><p>One has Lucky, Brave, Halfling Nimbleness, and Naturally Stealthy. The Other has Gnome Cunning, Natural Illusionist, and Beast Speech. </p><p></p><p>Those aren't feats. Those aren't ASI. And yet, they do a pretty good job of differentiating between the two races. In fact, they do a better job at differentiating between the races. Here, I'll show you. Just to be fair I'll let you know that I am not using any ASIs from Subraces, this is pure top level. Because, well, if I used subrace ASIs this would be even more ridiculous.</p><p></p><p></p><p>Race A has +2 Strength and +1 Con</p><p>Race B has +2 Strength and +1 Con</p><p></p><p>What races are they? </p><p></p><p>How about Race C has +2 Dex and Race D has +2 Dex? </p><p></p><p>Here, this is an uncommon one, how about Race E has +2 Cha and +1 Int, and then Race F has +2 Cha and +1 Int? </p><p></p><p></p><p>Now, let me give you some completely different sets. </p><p></p><p>Race #1 has Hidden Step and Race #2 has Severed from Dreams. </p><p></p><p>Race #3 has Long-Limbed while Race #4 has Shifting</p><p></p><p>Race #5 has Mirthful Leaps while Race #6 has Shapechanger</p><p></p><p>Notice how much easier it is to tell exactly which races I'm talking about from the numbers, instead of the lettered group? Traits are far far far more useful than ASIs. Heck, even if I pick two completely different sets, you can tell who they are far easier from a single trait that from their ASIs. </p><p></p><p>+2 Con, +1 Wisdom vs +2 Int +1Cha </p><p></p><p>or</p><p></p><p>Call to the Wave vs Breath Weapon</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Chaosmancer, post: 8203492, member: 6801228"] If you "can" modify them, then you don't have to. Meaning that you do not have to apply PC elf abilities to an Elf to make them an elf. So, how can you sit there and argue that you don't have to apply racial ASIs to an NPC for them to be an NPC of that race, but then also say that you must apply Racial ASIs to every member of the race? You are talking out of both sides of your mouth. And again, you want to focus on Racial Feats. Why? Literally, you are the only one who keeps trying to have this discussion, and you somehow also feel like taking away ASIs means taking away all racial traits. What makes a Lightfoot halfling different than a Forest Gnome? One has Lucky, Brave, Halfling Nimbleness, and Naturally Stealthy. The Other has Gnome Cunning, Natural Illusionist, and Beast Speech. Those aren't feats. Those aren't ASI. And yet, they do a pretty good job of differentiating between the two races. In fact, they do a better job at differentiating between the races. Here, I'll show you. Just to be fair I'll let you know that I am not using any ASIs from Subraces, this is pure top level. Because, well, if I used subrace ASIs this would be even more ridiculous. Race A has +2 Strength and +1 Con Race B has +2 Strength and +1 Con What races are they? How about Race C has +2 Dex and Race D has +2 Dex? Here, this is an uncommon one, how about Race E has +2 Cha and +1 Int, and then Race F has +2 Cha and +1 Int? Now, let me give you some completely different sets. Race #1 has Hidden Step and Race #2 has Severed from Dreams. Race #3 has Long-Limbed while Race #4 has Shifting Race #5 has Mirthful Leaps while Race #6 has Shapechanger Notice how much easier it is to tell exactly which races I'm talking about from the numbers, instead of the lettered group? Traits are far far far more useful than ASIs. Heck, even if I pick two completely different sets, you can tell who they are far easier from a single trait that from their ASIs. +2 Con, +1 Wisdom vs +2 Int +1Cha or Call to the Wave vs Breath Weapon [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Unearthed Arcana: Gothic Lineages & New Race/Culture Distinction
Top