Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="AbdulAlhazred" data-source="post: 5702063" data-attributes="member: 82106">This is pretty solid. If a DM doesn't want to deal with it, he just doesn't use it. If a player doesn't want to deal with it, he just doesn't take the feat. If you do take the feat, well, you get a fairly modest benefit. I can see some hand wringing possible with Honorable Action and deciding exactly what is an action in support of one's honor, but it will be pretty clear in a lot of cases. Even if a player wheedles the DM into letting him use it left and right he's only got 3 honor points to play with. The DM gets to give them out, so it isn't likely to get out of line. The fact that Honor-Bound requires a feat slot puts it even more in the realm of a trade-off to start with.I'm thinking of doing a sort of medieval chivalric epic sort of game, so maybe we'll give this thing a run through and see how it works out, since something like this seems almost required for that sort of setup.</blockquote>