Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Charlaquin" data-source="post: 8298028" data-attributes="member: 6779196">Very true! My post is trying to describe the distinction between the three classes in a way that would be satisfying for someone who prefers each class to have a very clear and distinct Lore identity, with little to no overlap. The kind of folks who question how a warlock who studies at Strixhaven isn’t just a wizard (because studying magic is what wizards do).My personal preference is not so strict. As I’ve mentioned, my preference for the warlock/patron relationship is for it to be analogous to an artist/patron relationship. The patron freely grants the warlock magical power to use as they see fit, with the expectation that the warlock will use it to do something they will like. Though there is an unspoken understanding that the patronage is contingent on the warlock keeping the patron appeased. There’s no contractual obligation, but if the patron doesn’t feel they’re getting enough return on their investment, they’ll likely take their patronage elsewhere.</blockquote>