Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Unearthed Arcana: Mages of Strixhaven
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Yaarel" data-source="post: 8298562" data-attributes="member: 58172"><p>That is a helpful quote to understand MTG.</p><p></p><p>I hate to say it, but. WotC must make an effort to tread carefully when describing a shaman. In old school D&D, the Orc mages were called "shamans" because they had lower Intelligence and were less civilized. This was potently racist against reallife shamanic cultures, nevermind racist against "less civilized" cultures as if less intelligent.</p><p></p><p>The thing is, there is some truth to the MTG description of a Shaman. As far as I can tell, the following sounds somewhat accurate.</p><p></p><p>"The shaman wields magic from ... personal experiences of nature ... from the world around her. ... Many shamans believe ... in ... the fundamental forces of nature. ... The values of self-expression ... and individual freedom ... flavor ... the shamans."</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>The following is incorrect: "The shaman derives magical power." Rather, the shaman is a magical power. Every being in nature is a magical power, including each human.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Shamanic traditions empathize with features of nature, both human and nonhuman. Shaman can relate to the instincts of animals, and sometimes even self-identify as animals. Some even take on the mind of animal, and some of these even shapeshift into the form of an animal. But likewise can empathize with stones and trees, and other features of the world. Nonhuman aspects of our planet are important, and the shaman personalizes the relationship with them.</p><p></p><p>Nevertheless, the following descriptions seem to imply that shamans are less intelligent and less sophisticated, and make me uncomfortable.</p><p></p><p>"The shaman ... wields magic from the gut, who lets her emotions ... guide her enlightenment. The shaman derives magical power ... without allowing too much abstract, ivory-tower thinking to get in the way. A shaman derives power from her passion and her instincts. Many shamans believe fervently in the importance of ... their own instincts. ... The values of ... motivation by instinct and passion rather than forethought, ... hit ... the flavor of shamans right on the head."</p><p></p><p>Ouch.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Perhaps it is extremely important to explicitly identify shamanism with "psionics". So the intellectual connotations of the psionic classes can mitigate the potential racism against the "less intelligent" cultures.</p><p></p><p>Psionics is the power of any mind, whether a human mind or a nonhuman mind. The mind includes both thinking and feeling.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Yaarel, post: 8298562, member: 58172"] That is a helpful quote to understand MTG. I hate to say it, but. WotC must make an effort to tread carefully when describing a shaman. In old school D&D, the Orc mages were called "shamans" because they had lower Intelligence and were less civilized. This was potently racist against reallife shamanic cultures, nevermind racist against "less civilized" cultures as if less intelligent. The thing is, there is some truth to the MTG description of a Shaman. As far as I can tell, the following sounds somewhat accurate. "The shaman wields magic from ... personal experiences of nature ... from the world around her. ... Many shamans believe ... in ... the fundamental forces of nature. ... The values of self-expression ... and individual freedom ... flavor ... the shamans." The following is incorrect: "The shaman derives magical power." Rather, the shaman is a magical power. Every being in nature is a magical power, including each human. Shamanic traditions empathize with features of nature, both human and nonhuman. Shaman can relate to the instincts of animals, and sometimes even self-identify as animals. Some even take on the mind of animal, and some of these even shapeshift into the form of an animal. But likewise can empathize with stones and trees, and other features of the world. Nonhuman aspects of our planet are important, and the shaman personalizes the relationship with them. Nevertheless, the following descriptions seem to imply that shamans are less intelligent and less sophisticated, and make me uncomfortable. "The shaman ... wields magic from the gut, who lets her emotions ... guide her enlightenment. The shaman derives magical power ... without allowing too much abstract, ivory-tower thinking to get in the way. A shaman derives power from her passion and her instincts. Many shamans believe fervently in the importance of ... their own instincts. ... The values of ... motivation by instinct and passion rather than forethought, ... hit ... the flavor of shamans right on the head." Ouch. Perhaps it is extremely important to explicitly identify shamanism with "psionics". So the intellectual connotations of the psionic classes can mitigate the potential racism against the "less intelligent" cultures. Psionics is the power of any mind, whether a human mind or a nonhuman mind. The mind includes both thinking and feeling. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Unearthed Arcana: Mages of Strixhaven
Top