Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Unearthed Arcana Revisits Psionics
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="ccooke" data-source="post: 7964282" data-attributes="member: 6695890"><p>From the wording, it's not currently clear which version was intended.</p><p></p><p>However, I would say that having you be unable to use replenishment once the die drops below a d4 would be very unlike anything else in 5e. Consider the mechanically similar ability for Wizards and (Land) druids to regain spell slots. Normally, once you have used up all of your spell slots, they are gone for the day. Full stop. However, using Arcane Recovery, you gain new slots. </p><p></p><p>I'm not saying that it's impossible that WotC intended the ability to be a gamble as you say, but I think it would be very unlike any other ability they have created. It would also be rife for causing people to hold off on using their psychic abilities once it dropped to a d4 for fear of losing it completely. What's more, the number of abilities that reduce your die size directly (without a roll) implies that this is intended to be a power economy - and several of <em>those</em> abilities are bonus actions, which would mean otherwise that you would be guaranteed losing your psychic ability for the day if you activate them while they are d4s. That strikes me as poorer design than this UA looks to be.</p><p></p><p>No, on further study I'm going to say that they intended to have the replenishment work if you have dropped below a d4 and just didn't get the wording quite right in the UA. </p><p></p><p>... Either that or everything good about the design here is a total fluke. I think I'll go for the "good design" option :-D</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="ccooke, post: 7964282, member: 6695890"] From the wording, it's not currently clear which version was intended. However, I would say that having you be unable to use replenishment once the die drops below a d4 would be very unlike anything else in 5e. Consider the mechanically similar ability for Wizards and (Land) druids to regain spell slots. Normally, once you have used up all of your spell slots, they are gone for the day. Full stop. However, using Arcane Recovery, you gain new slots. I'm not saying that it's impossible that WotC intended the ability to be a gamble as you say, but I think it would be very unlike any other ability they have created. It would also be rife for causing people to hold off on using their psychic abilities once it dropped to a d4 for fear of losing it completely. What's more, the number of abilities that reduce your die size directly (without a roll) implies that this is intended to be a power economy - and several of [I]those[/I] abilities are bonus actions, which would mean otherwise that you would be guaranteed losing your psychic ability for the day if you activate them while they are d4s. That strikes me as poorer design than this UA looks to be. No, on further study I'm going to say that they intended to have the replenishment work if you have dropped below a d4 and just didn't get the wording quite right in the UA. ... Either that or everything good about the design here is a total fluke. I think I'll go for the "good design" option :-D [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Unearthed Arcana Revisits Psionics
Top