Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Particle_Man" data-source="post: 1380219" data-attributes="member: 892">Careful, that is not quite what I said above.&nbsp; *One* of my four arguments compared the expert to rogue and bard.&nbsp; *Another* of my arguments compared the expert to the other two generics (and lo, it was found wanting).&nbsp; *Another* of my&nbsp; arguments was questioning whether the expert was really filling out a niche that could not be filled out just as well by the other two generics, either in sufficiently large numbers or with *slight* modifications.&nbsp; *Another* of my arguments was questioning whether the expert is needed at all.&nbsp; Of my four arguments, therefore, only one compared the expert to the rogue and bard.I am glad you are confident in your belief that two good saves and four more skill points than the other classes is enough to distinguish them.&nbsp; But as my other three arguments show, I respectfully disagree.&nbsp; And so far I have seen no arguments to justify your beliefs over mine.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Particle_Man, post: 1380219, member: 892"] Careful, that is not quite what I said above. *One* of my four arguments compared the expert to rogue and bard. *Another* of my arguments compared the expert to the other two generics (and lo, it was found wanting). *Another* of my arguments was questioning whether the expert was really filling out a niche that could not be filled out just as well by the other two generics, either in sufficiently large numbers or with *slight* modifications. *Another* of my arguments was questioning whether the expert is needed at all. Of my four arguments, therefore, only one compared the expert to the rogue and bard. I am glad you are confident in your belief that two good saves and four more skill points than the other classes is enough to distinguish them. But as my other three arguments show, I respectfully disagree. And so far I have seen no arguments to justify your beliefs over mine. [/QUOTE]

Verification