Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Felon" data-source="post: 1358715" data-attributes="member: 8158">Well, the paladin gets that special mount, so the inclusion of a mounted combat feat is pretty logical--and more to the point, the absence of that prereq probably doesn't do a lot to deviate it from the cavalier stereotype since he'll still have the pokemount.Ah, OK.It's pretty much just a type of Con. damage without much of a system to it, but OK I guess you could use it that way. IIRC, the honor rules were in issue #304 or 305 of Dragon (it was an issue dedicated to knights & chivalry). I believe the articles about taint, temptation, & redemption were in #306, which is also the issue that presented those variant (aquatic, arctic, etc).</blockquote>