Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Scribble" data-source="post: 5306786" data-attributes="member: 23977">We can go back and forth on this like Aegeri mentioned, but suffice it to say- I think there are a lot of people that tend to approach these things with&nbsp; &quot;What's the negative slant that could possibly fit this particular issue? How are they screwing us?&quot;I don't see it that way. Personally I see a section of the magazine that is going to offer us stuff that doesn't &quot;fit the mold.&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp; This offers people who don't need/want everything to fit the mold a place to get that content.Look how much back and forth there was by people about that original &quot;magic items we can't publish&quot; blog post. Clearly there's a group that wants stuff like this.I see it as akin to deleted scenes and blooper reels on DVDs. Some people think it's a waste of space, others think it's a neat look at content that otherwise wouldn't see the light of day.If this type of content isn't your thing- I got no beef with that.&nbsp; I just don't agree with the &quot;I've found the secret reason they're doing this, and here's why it's bad&quot; posts... Pretty much ever. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f61b.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":P" title="Stick out tongue&nbsp; &nbsp; :P"&nbsp; data-smilie="7"data-shortname=":P" />Would it be better if they also published more &quot;official&quot; content... Sure (Although I think the quality of articles in dungeon has actually increased) but I think that's a discussion for that other thread I'd say.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Scribble, post: 5306786, member: 23977"] We can go back and forth on this like Aegeri mentioned, but suffice it to say- I think there are a lot of people that tend to approach these things with "What's the negative slant that could possibly fit this particular issue? How are they screwing us?" I don't see it that way. Personally I see a section of the magazine that is going to offer us stuff that doesn't "fit the mold." This offers people who don't need/want everything to fit the mold a place to get that content. Look how much back and forth there was by people about that original "magic items we can't publish" blog post. Clearly there's a group that wants stuff like this. I see it as akin to deleted scenes and blooper reels on DVDs. Some people think it's a waste of space, others think it's a neat look at content that otherwise wouldn't see the light of day. If this type of content isn't your thing- I got no beef with that. I just don't agree with the "I've found the secret reason they're doing this, and here's why it's bad" posts... Pretty much ever. :P Would it be better if they also published more "official" content... Sure (Although I think the quality of articles in dungeon has actually increased) but I think that's a discussion for that other thread I'd say. [/QUOTE]

Verification