Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Ruin Explorer" data-source="post: 6364106" data-attributes="member: 18">Yeah, if I was going low-magic, I'd definitely read this as Fighters (etc.) CAN cast the spell from the scroll, with the INT check - because I'd already have banned Wizards and Sorcerers, who clearly don't fit in a low-magic campaign (possibly also Clerics, Bards and maybe even 5E Paladins - but probably not Warlocks - they'd be the &quot;default Caster&quot; or a low-magic world).I think it's a huge stretch to try and say it's &quot;spellcasters only&quot;, myself, because it doesn't say that, it just talks about if it's on your classes spell list - if you don't have a spell list, it can't be on it, but you're apparently introducing &quot;and if you don't have a spell list...&quot; which is something that would be in the rule if it was intended! There's no such thing as a &quot;spellcaster&quot; in 5E, nor is &quot;spellcaster&quot; mentioned in the rule, I note - Feats give spells to potentially any class, too.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Ruin Explorer, post: 6364106, member: 18"] Yeah, if I was going low-magic, I'd definitely read this as Fighters (etc.) CAN cast the spell from the scroll, with the INT check - because I'd already have banned Wizards and Sorcerers, who clearly don't fit in a low-magic campaign (possibly also Clerics, Bards and maybe even 5E Paladins - but probably not Warlocks - they'd be the "default Caster" or a low-magic world). I think it's a huge stretch to try and say it's "spellcasters only", myself, because it doesn't say that, it just talks about if it's on your classes spell list - if you don't have a spell list, it can't be on it, but you're apparently introducing "and if you don't have a spell list..." which is something that would be in the rule if it was intended! There's no such thing as a "spellcaster" in 5E, nor is "spellcaster" mentioned in the rule, I note - Feats give spells to potentially any class, too. [/QUOTE]

Verification