Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
unfortunately not Finally settled, sunder and attacks of opp
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Hypersmurf" data-source="post: 3356390" data-attributes="member: 1656"><p>It says it's an attack...?</p><p></p><p>Sunder and Bull Rush are both defined as standard actions; I'm not sure why one definition counts and the other doesn't...?</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>... right. If you want to Sunder, it takes a standard action. Isn't that what I've been saying?</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>It means that unless the specific supernatural ability states otherwise, it's a standard action.</p><p></p><p>As written, for example, Smite Evil is a standard action, because it doesn't specify otherwise; that standard action allows you to make a normal melee attack with some bonuses.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Rather, if you take the attack action, it's a standard action. Making an attack might be part of the attack action, the full attack action, the charge action, the Manyshot action, the Sunder action, the Cast a Spell action, the Smite Evil action, or even an AoO. Using a melee attack to strike an opponent's weapon or shield, on the other hand, is part of the Sunder action.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Right. If you take the Sunder action in combat, it counts as a standard action.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>A Trip isn't a standard action; it replaces a melee attack, and can thus be used once in an Attack or Charge action, one or more times in a Full Attack action, or on an AoO. A Sunder <em>is</em> a standard action, and you can use a melee attack to strike an opponent's weapon or shield.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>The attack <em>action</em> is a standard action. Making a melee attack is part of assorted actions - one of which is the Sunder standard action.</p><p></p><p>The Full Attack action does not consist of multiple standard actions strung together; rather, it's multiple melee attacks, all of which are part of a single full round action.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I'm saying that if you're not taking the Charge action, the description of what happens when you Charge is irrelevant. If you're not taking the Cast a Spell action, it doesn't matter how you cast spells.</p><p></p><p>If you're taking the Sunder action, you can use a melee attack to strike an opponent's weapon or shield. If you aren't taking the Sunder action, you can't use a melee attack to strike an opponent's weapon or shield.</p><p></p><p>If you're taking the Full Attack action, you aren't taking the Sunder action... so you can't use a melee attack to strike an opponent's weapon or shield. If you're making an AoO, you aren't taking the Sunder action... so you can't use a melee attack to strike an opponent's weapon or shield. You can only use a melee attack to strike an opponent's weapon or shield if you're taking the Sunder action... which is a standard action, not action type: varies.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Not if you aren't taking the Sunder action.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Are you telling me it makes sense that if someone's running past you, you could grapple them, disarm them, attack them, trip them, but not shove them off the bridge?</p><p></p><p>Are you telling me it makes sense that if someone tries to shoot at you four times, you could (with Combat Reflexes) hit them four times... but if they're paralyzed, you don't even get to hit them once?</p><p></p><p>I'm not concerned with what 'makes sense'; I'm merely concerned with the fact that the table says Sunder is a standard action, and the description of that standard action says you can use a melee attack to strike a weapon. If you aren't taking the action, you aren't striking the weapon...</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>But there's no contradiction. When you're taking the standard action (per the table), what can you do? You can use a melee attack to strike a weapon (per the text). Both are satisfied; neither needs to take precedence, because both are true.</p><p></p><p>-Hyp.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Hypersmurf, post: 3356390, member: 1656"] It says it's an attack...? Sunder and Bull Rush are both defined as standard actions; I'm not sure why one definition counts and the other doesn't...? ... right. If you want to Sunder, it takes a standard action. Isn't that what I've been saying? It means that unless the specific supernatural ability states otherwise, it's a standard action. As written, for example, Smite Evil is a standard action, because it doesn't specify otherwise; that standard action allows you to make a normal melee attack with some bonuses. Rather, if you take the attack action, it's a standard action. Making an attack might be part of the attack action, the full attack action, the charge action, the Manyshot action, the Sunder action, the Cast a Spell action, the Smite Evil action, or even an AoO. Using a melee attack to strike an opponent's weapon or shield, on the other hand, is part of the Sunder action. Right. If you take the Sunder action in combat, it counts as a standard action. A Trip isn't a standard action; it replaces a melee attack, and can thus be used once in an Attack or Charge action, one or more times in a Full Attack action, or on an AoO. A Sunder [i]is[/i] a standard action, and you can use a melee attack to strike an opponent's weapon or shield. The attack [i]action[/i] is a standard action. Making a melee attack is part of assorted actions - one of which is the Sunder standard action. The Full Attack action does not consist of multiple standard actions strung together; rather, it's multiple melee attacks, all of which are part of a single full round action. I'm saying that if you're not taking the Charge action, the description of what happens when you Charge is irrelevant. If you're not taking the Cast a Spell action, it doesn't matter how you cast spells. If you're taking the Sunder action, you can use a melee attack to strike an opponent's weapon or shield. If you aren't taking the Sunder action, you can't use a melee attack to strike an opponent's weapon or shield. If you're taking the Full Attack action, you aren't taking the Sunder action... so you can't use a melee attack to strike an opponent's weapon or shield. If you're making an AoO, you aren't taking the Sunder action... so you can't use a melee attack to strike an opponent's weapon or shield. You can only use a melee attack to strike an opponent's weapon or shield if you're taking the Sunder action... which is a standard action, not action type: varies. Not if you aren't taking the Sunder action. Are you telling me it makes sense that if someone's running past you, you could grapple them, disarm them, attack them, trip them, but not shove them off the bridge? Are you telling me it makes sense that if someone tries to shoot at you four times, you could (with Combat Reflexes) hit them four times... but if they're paralyzed, you don't even get to hit them once? I'm not concerned with what 'makes sense'; I'm merely concerned with the fact that the table says Sunder is a standard action, and the description of that standard action says you can use a melee attack to strike a weapon. If you aren't taking the action, you aren't striking the weapon... But there's no contradiction. When you're taking the standard action (per the table), what can you do? You can use a melee attack to strike a weapon (per the text). Both are satisfied; neither needs to take precedence, because both are true. -Hyp. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
unfortunately not Finally settled, sunder and attacks of opp
Top