Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
unfortunately not Finally settled, sunder and attacks of opp
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="bestone" data-source="post: 3356451" data-attributes="member: 48880"><p>Heres your position, either</p><p>a)</p><p></p><p>Sunder is a standard action, because the table says so. The text of an attack only applies if you have the standard action to do so (which you've yet to quote a rule to prove this), regardless of what the text says. Which then contradicts all your earlier comments, and regardless of what a supernatural ability or other such thing says, and states how it works, you have to be able to have a standard action to even apply the text.</p><p></p><p>or b)</p><p>"When you use a sunder action"...... </p><p></p><p>which is not how its writte, and not rules as written</p><p></p><p>I've quoted rules, and pulled refrences, you have a claim based on assumption, im using the rules as written. Once you pull rules to support your claim, this argument is over and your right, if you dont have rules to support your claim....then your claim cant be held as raw.</p><p></p><p>Edit:</p><p></p><p>Or better yet, lets use your logic, whats the difference between a standard action and another?</p><p></p><p>You "claim" (unfoundedly) that you have to be able to do a standard action action for the text of a special attack listed on a table as a standard action to apply (regardless of how the text actually says it works)</p><p></p><p>When your making an attack of opportunity, your making a melee attack, a melee attack counts as a standard action, so you are, in essence, doing a standard action, and sunder is a special attack, so your doing an attack, you make it a special attack, and read the rules for the special attack which states you can use your melee attack (standard action) to sunder (requires a standard action)</p><p></p><p>Bottom line? The text of special attacks tell you how you can apply them, and thats how you apply them. If you use sunder then its a standard action, not you must have a standard action in order to sunder. You read the special attack, it tells you how to use it. Thats how you use it. If you use it on your turn, its a standard action. If you use it as an attack of opporunity, well then its still a standard action (as is trip/grapple/blah/blah) but your using it as your attack of opportunity.</p><p></p><p>Sunder is listed as Sunder (attack) on that table</p><p></p><p>You find me a rule that states that the text of a special attack only comes into effect if you have a standard action make the attack with, regardless of the text for the attack or how it states it works. or you have no legs to stand on in this argument.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>If we use your logic, there is a disagreement between the rules, Using your logic, the table states that sunder is a standard action, and can only be used when you have a standard action. However under sunder it says You can use a melee attack, *which can be an attack of opportunity*</p><p></p><p>So again, using your logic CREATES a disagreement, so you go by the text, which tells you how you can use it, and thats how you can use it</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="bestone, post: 3356451, member: 48880"] Heres your position, either a) Sunder is a standard action, because the table says so. The text of an attack only applies if you have the standard action to do so (which you've yet to quote a rule to prove this), regardless of what the text says. Which then contradicts all your earlier comments, and regardless of what a supernatural ability or other such thing says, and states how it works, you have to be able to have a standard action to even apply the text. or b) "When you use a sunder action"...... which is not how its writte, and not rules as written I've quoted rules, and pulled refrences, you have a claim based on assumption, im using the rules as written. Once you pull rules to support your claim, this argument is over and your right, if you dont have rules to support your claim....then your claim cant be held as raw. Edit: Or better yet, lets use your logic, whats the difference between a standard action and another? You "claim" (unfoundedly) that you have to be able to do a standard action action for the text of a special attack listed on a table as a standard action to apply (regardless of how the text actually says it works) When your making an attack of opportunity, your making a melee attack, a melee attack counts as a standard action, so you are, in essence, doing a standard action, and sunder is a special attack, so your doing an attack, you make it a special attack, and read the rules for the special attack which states you can use your melee attack (standard action) to sunder (requires a standard action) Bottom line? The text of special attacks tell you how you can apply them, and thats how you apply them. If you use sunder then its a standard action, not you must have a standard action in order to sunder. You read the special attack, it tells you how to use it. Thats how you use it. If you use it on your turn, its a standard action. If you use it as an attack of opporunity, well then its still a standard action (as is trip/grapple/blah/blah) but your using it as your attack of opportunity. Sunder is listed as Sunder (attack) on that table You find me a rule that states that the text of a special attack only comes into effect if you have a standard action make the attack with, regardless of the text for the attack or how it states it works. or you have no legs to stand on in this argument. If we use your logic, there is a disagreement between the rules, Using your logic, the table states that sunder is a standard action, and can only be used when you have a standard action. However under sunder it says You can use a melee attack, *which can be an attack of opportunity* So again, using your logic CREATES a disagreement, so you go by the text, which tells you how you can use it, and thats how you can use it [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
unfortunately not Finally settled, sunder and attacks of opp
Top