Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Legildur" data-source="post: 3356537" data-attributes="member: 1258">Hyp's logic is just fine.&nbsp; And before everyone wastes a lot of time responding to this debate.. AGAIN... I would recommend that you search for some recent threads on this topic.... there are a few of them to chose from, and they are all reasonably lengthy and very detailed.Sunder uses a melee attack as its mechanic to resolve that Standard Action.&nbsp; It can't be used in a Full Attack or as an AOO.&nbsp; This reading of the relevant paragraphs is perfectly consistent with the table.&nbsp; Whereas your reading assumes an omission in the table (the lack of footnote 7). Which is the more likely to be right?&nbsp; Just apply Occam's Razor, and I think you'll have the answer.Edit: I will add that there is some significant support for your point of view. Which is why earlier threads on this topic are lengthy and contain often heated debate.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Legildur, post: 3356537, member: 1258"] Hyp's logic is just fine. And before everyone wastes a lot of time responding to this debate.. AGAIN... I would recommend that you search for some recent threads on this topic.... there are a few of them to chose from, and they are all reasonably lengthy and very detailed. Sunder uses a melee attack as its mechanic to resolve that Standard Action. It can't be used in a Full Attack or as an AOO. This reading of the relevant paragraphs is perfectly consistent with the table. Whereas your reading assumes an omission in the table (the lack of footnote 7). Which is the more likely to be right? Just apply Occam's Razor, and I think you'll have the answer. Edit: I will add that there is some significant support for your point of view. Which is why earlier threads on this topic are lengthy and contain often heated debate. [/QUOTE]

Verification