Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="bestone" data-source="post: 3357677" data-attributes="member: 48880">If you want to make a sunder attack, you read the text for sunder. It tells you how you make the attack, and you've agree that the text under sunder is clear.Your using assumptions based on a table that is considered secondary to text.Untill you can pull a rule to prove your claim, that states you Cant use the text on how a standard action works unless you have the action free listed in the table. Your not gonna prove your side.And if you did find text of that, it'd break supernatural abilities.I'll read the rule for sunder, under the special attacks section, under sunderIt tells me how it works, the rule for it is quite clear.I'll use it as that, as that is the raw, and unless there is a ruling saying You dont read the text of a special attack if its listed as a standard action and you can make one. Then i'll run it differently. But as there is no such rule. Its clear where it, and i standThis was not, nor never intended to be a trolling post, as seeten stated earlier, And i take quite an insult to that.As far as i knew published wizards material was correct, i found TWO articles stating sunder can be taken as an attack of opportunity. So i thought i'd point it out as i THOUGHT this was an official thing.Just because you dont believe a ruling by a game designer seeten, doesnt mean i was trying to troll. I thought it was official..... who was i to know that because he made mistakes his opinion is invalid?</blockquote>

Verification