Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
unfortunately not Finally settled, sunder and attacks of opp
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="bestone" data-source="post: 3358870" data-attributes="member: 48880"><p>AND i've already quoted hyp to agreeing that the rule as written under sunder is taken in the way i've said it works.</p><p></p><p>Your working off an assumption that because its a standard action, the that text would permit you to use it as an attack of opportunity doesnt apply. And i ask you to quote a rule that proves your assumption.</p><p></p><p>when in fact, the only thing it says under attack types, is they tell you how long the action takes to perform.</p><p></p><p>You dont ignore the text of a rule, because the rule is jus that, a rule, it tells you how you can do it, and how its done. Tables are vague, and this is why they are secondary. Text is primary, and by the text, as its written, you can use sunder on an aoo.</p><p></p><p>if you apply the secondary information from the tables, sure its a standard action, but the primary text still, as written, says you can use sunder on an aoo.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>We all seem to be in agreeance on what the rules under sunder state.</p><p></p><p>Now show me a rule that states you can dis-regard that ruling of text simply because sundering counts as a standard action?</p><p></p><p>You wont find one, because regardless of what type of action something is considered (and an action only tells you how long something takes to do, AS STATED IN THE PHB AND QUOTED BY HYP). The rules still state how you can use it, and all are agree'd on what the rules for sunder state.</p><p></p><p>As it comes down to it, We all know what the description of sunder states, and how it states you can use it.</p><p></p><p>I dont have to prove otherwise, i make no claim otherwise, i say it works as its written. No rules gymnastics, nothing fancy.</p><p></p><p>Those arguing against still have to prove how you get to dis-regard the rules for sunder, as written, because it is a standard action. You havent been able to thus far, and you wont be able to, because there is no such rule.</p><p></p><p>You can cling to the fact its a standard action all you want, that proves nothing.</p><p></p><p>The primary source of information, the text, tells you how to use it.</p><p></p><p>The table, tells you "in essence" how long it takes to do it</p><p></p><p>And even considering that action types are simply how long it takes to do it, whats so far fetched about sundering on an aoo? when it takes the same amount of time *as suggested by the action types description* as a melee attack.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="bestone, post: 3358870, member: 48880"] AND i've already quoted hyp to agreeing that the rule as written under sunder is taken in the way i've said it works. Your working off an assumption that because its a standard action, the that text would permit you to use it as an attack of opportunity doesnt apply. And i ask you to quote a rule that proves your assumption. when in fact, the only thing it says under attack types, is they tell you how long the action takes to perform. You dont ignore the text of a rule, because the rule is jus that, a rule, it tells you how you can do it, and how its done. Tables are vague, and this is why they are secondary. Text is primary, and by the text, as its written, you can use sunder on an aoo. if you apply the secondary information from the tables, sure its a standard action, but the primary text still, as written, says you can use sunder on an aoo. We all seem to be in agreeance on what the rules under sunder state. Now show me a rule that states you can dis-regard that ruling of text simply because sundering counts as a standard action? You wont find one, because regardless of what type of action something is considered (and an action only tells you how long something takes to do, AS STATED IN THE PHB AND QUOTED BY HYP). The rules still state how you can use it, and all are agree'd on what the rules for sunder state. As it comes down to it, We all know what the description of sunder states, and how it states you can use it. I dont have to prove otherwise, i make no claim otherwise, i say it works as its written. No rules gymnastics, nothing fancy. Those arguing against still have to prove how you get to dis-regard the rules for sunder, as written, because it is a standard action. You havent been able to thus far, and you wont be able to, because there is no such rule. You can cling to the fact its a standard action all you want, that proves nothing. The primary source of information, the text, tells you how to use it. The table, tells you "in essence" how long it takes to do it And even considering that action types are simply how long it takes to do it, whats so far fetched about sundering on an aoo? when it takes the same amount of time *as suggested by the action types description* as a melee attack. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
unfortunately not Finally settled, sunder and attacks of opp
Top