Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
unfortunately not Finally settled, sunder and attacks of opp
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="bestone" data-source="post: 3358892" data-attributes="member: 48880"><p>My side of the argument has quoted rules, game designers, published wizard articles, and other sources that agree with us.</p><p></p><p>Hyp's side of the argument is relying on the statement</p><p></p><p>You cant use the description for sunder, unless you have the action to make the standard action sunder.</p><p></p><p>I've asked for a rule to prove this staement, a quote, i get none</p><p></p><p>There is no rule that states that the rules written for something dont apply if that something is considered a standard action. There is no rule stating that you must be able to make a standard action, if something as labeled as such, for the rule to apply. i've never read anything of the like thats written that you get to ignore the rules on how to apply or use something becasue its listed as a type of action anyhwere.</p><p></p><p>You dont get to dis-regard the text as hyp claims, the text is the rule for sunder, it is the primary source of information on how to use sunder.</p><p></p><p>Thus, how can you possibly tell me, the rules as given under sunder, which we are all in agreeance with, dont apply, and expect me to take them as raw?</p><p></p><p>In my argument, i quote the rules, and say we go by whats ruled under sunder</p><p></p><p>You quote what? ...what rule? I've yet to see a rule quoted that as i've said many times now, that allows you to ignore, or not use sunder, as it is written.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="bestone, post: 3358892, member: 48880"] My side of the argument has quoted rules, game designers, published wizard articles, and other sources that agree with us. Hyp's side of the argument is relying on the statement You cant use the description for sunder, unless you have the action to make the standard action sunder. I've asked for a rule to prove this staement, a quote, i get none There is no rule that states that the rules written for something dont apply if that something is considered a standard action. There is no rule stating that you must be able to make a standard action, if something as labeled as such, for the rule to apply. i've never read anything of the like thats written that you get to ignore the rules on how to apply or use something becasue its listed as a type of action anyhwere. You dont get to dis-regard the text as hyp claims, the text is the rule for sunder, it is the primary source of information on how to use sunder. Thus, how can you possibly tell me, the rules as given under sunder, which we are all in agreeance with, dont apply, and expect me to take them as raw? In my argument, i quote the rules, and say we go by whats ruled under sunder You quote what? ...what rule? I've yet to see a rule quoted that as i've said many times now, that allows you to ignore, or not use sunder, as it is written. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
unfortunately not Finally settled, sunder and attacks of opp
Top