Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
unfortunately not Finally settled, sunder and attacks of opp
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="bestone" data-source="post: 3362336" data-attributes="member: 48880"><p>What he is saying is the primary source of information doesnt state it has to be used as any sort of action. It does however state that you can use it as a melee attack. Which i dont know how you could read that differently. I see what your saying however, Its a standard action, and you can use that standard action as a melee attack. But i dont think that table limits it to that, i belive the table shows that making a melee attack to sunder during your round would be a standard action, but the text (imho) explicity allows you to use it in other situations, like on an aoo.</p><p></p><p>And one of the reasons i believe this is - aoo says make a melee attack, sunder says use a melee attack. </p><p></p><p>The point for me is, i just dont see any rule that specifically would limit you from using that text *which allows you to USE a melee attack* on something that gives you a melee attack.</p><p></p><p>Edit- And like i said, i realise your saying well it is a standard action because the table says so (but i believe the table - actions in combat - tells you when you take an action to sunder in combat, then it simply counts as a standard action, but i may very well be wrong on that)</p><p></p><p>And that you have to have a standard action for the text of the special attack to apply.</p><p></p><p>But i dont buy that. The primary source doesnt explicitly limit to a standard aaction. The table says using it is a standard action. But even still, the rule for the special attack sunder gives it a use that may not be any specific action at all.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="bestone, post: 3362336, member: 48880"] What he is saying is the primary source of information doesnt state it has to be used as any sort of action. It does however state that you can use it as a melee attack. Which i dont know how you could read that differently. I see what your saying however, Its a standard action, and you can use that standard action as a melee attack. But i dont think that table limits it to that, i belive the table shows that making a melee attack to sunder during your round would be a standard action, but the text (imho) explicity allows you to use it in other situations, like on an aoo. And one of the reasons i believe this is - aoo says make a melee attack, sunder says use a melee attack. The point for me is, i just dont see any rule that specifically would limit you from using that text *which allows you to USE a melee attack* on something that gives you a melee attack. Edit- And like i said, i realise your saying well it is a standard action because the table says so (but i believe the table - actions in combat - tells you when you take an action to sunder in combat, then it simply counts as a standard action, but i may very well be wrong on that) And that you have to have a standard action for the text of the special attack to apply. But i dont buy that. The primary source doesnt explicitly limit to a standard aaction. The table says using it is a standard action. But even still, the rule for the special attack sunder gives it a use that may not be any specific action at all. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
unfortunately not Finally settled, sunder and attacks of opp
Top