Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
unfortunately not Finally settled, sunder and attacks of opp
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="SlagMortar" data-source="post: 3363024" data-attributes="member: 24821"><p>I would interpret "as a melee attack" to mean that it is identical to all other melee attacks except where the rules note differently. If there were no table, the sunder would not have any rules noting differently. Since there is a table, I understand Hyp's interpretation as a possible interpretation where the table and text are not in conflict. </p><p></p><p></p><p>You know what, that would in fact be a valid interpretation as far as I can see if you want to bend it enough. Another interpretation would be that when you "use" a melee attack it can not be "used" for anything else. </p><p></p><p>Look at this quote found <a href="http://www.d20srd.org/srd/combat/combatStatistics.htm#damage" target="_blank">here</a>:</p><p></p><p>Thus all successful attacks (regular attacks, disarms, sunders, bull rushes, etc) deal damage based on the weapon used. Please point out the rule to me that indicates a successful disarm does not deal damage.</p><p></p><p>All rules require some interpretation. It is not a stretch to believe that "melee attack" in one section of the rule book means the same thing as "melee attack" in another section of the rule book, unless there is other information indicating they are not the same.</p><p></p><p>I believe the analysis in this thread is at least 10 times more rigorous than the collective analysis put into writing the sunder rules in the first place. At some point, there has to be something similar to the "beyond a reasonable doubt" for dungeons and dragons. Rules analysis can only be taken as far as determining all possible interpretations the authors might reasonably intended at which point the remaining interpretations are equally valid.</p><p></p><p>Edit: By the way, if you all wouldn't mind putting your collective brain power into helping me answer a <a href="http://www.enworld.org/showthread.php?t=189169" target="_blank">question </a> regarding bull rush and charging, I would appreciate it. My thread feels lonely and surely this topic is at least newer than sunder.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="SlagMortar, post: 3363024, member: 24821"] I would interpret "as a melee attack" to mean that it is identical to all other melee attacks except where the rules note differently. If there were no table, the sunder would not have any rules noting differently. Since there is a table, I understand Hyp's interpretation as a possible interpretation where the table and text are not in conflict. You know what, that would in fact be a valid interpretation as far as I can see if you want to bend it enough. Another interpretation would be that when you "use" a melee attack it can not be "used" for anything else. Look at this quote found [URL=http://www.d20srd.org/srd/combat/combatStatistics.htm#damage]here[/URL]: Thus all successful attacks (regular attacks, disarms, sunders, bull rushes, etc) deal damage based on the weapon used. Please point out the rule to me that indicates a successful disarm does not deal damage. All rules require some interpretation. It is not a stretch to believe that "melee attack" in one section of the rule book means the same thing as "melee attack" in another section of the rule book, unless there is other information indicating they are not the same. I believe the analysis in this thread is at least 10 times more rigorous than the collective analysis put into writing the sunder rules in the first place. At some point, there has to be something similar to the "beyond a reasonable doubt" for dungeons and dragons. Rules analysis can only be taken as far as determining all possible interpretations the authors might reasonably intended at which point the remaining interpretations are equally valid. Edit: By the way, if you all wouldn't mind putting your collective brain power into helping me answer a [URL=http://www.enworld.org/showthread.php?t=189169]question [/URL] regarding bull rush and charging, I would appreciate it. My thread feels lonely and surely this topic is at least newer than sunder. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
unfortunately not Finally settled, sunder and attacks of opp
Top