Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="JeffB" data-source="post: 5994950" data-attributes="member: 518">This is critical to me. Personally I never ran 4e as a tactical combat game with adventure filler as many detractors think. To me it was FUN to DM, and it made prep much easier, and at times fun as well. When running combat, the monsters were more fun as well because of newer varied attacks/powers. Running PFBB for my son at about 3rd level now, I am already getting bored in combat and so is he.&nbsp; I have my issues with 4e on the PC side of things, , but I really enjoyed it from the DM perspective.DM support, which includes tools (electronic and otherwise) for easy prep, solid adventure material,&nbsp; flexibility/framework systems I can mold/re skin, and easy to run but flavorful monsters ( I dont mean a page of fluff text) are the things that ultimately will determine whether I am on board with next. On the DM side of the coin, C&amp;C has been doing what we are seeing in NEXT, and has been for 5 or 6 years.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="JeffB, post: 5994950, member: 518"] This is critical to me. Personally I never ran 4e as a tactical combat game with adventure filler as many detractors think. To me it was FUN to DM, and it made prep much easier, and at times fun as well. When running combat, the monsters were more fun as well because of newer varied attacks/powers. Running PFBB for my son at about 3rd level now, I am already getting bored in combat and so is he. I have my issues with 4e on the PC side of things, , but I really enjoyed it from the DM perspective. DM support, which includes tools (electronic and otherwise) for easy prep, solid adventure material, flexibility/framework systems I can mold/re skin, and easy to run but flavorful monsters ( I dont mean a page of fluff text) are the things that ultimately will determine whether I am on board with next. On the DM side of the coin, C&C has been doing what we are seeing in NEXT, and has been for 5 or 6 years. [/QUOTE]

Verification