Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="UngeheuerLich" data-source="post: 5809099" data-attributes="member: 59057">4e spells were all well balanced... but personal spell lists were a disaster for D&D... Cleric casts hold person, the wizard casts nearly the same spell which is called different.Iconics are important.I also don´t feel a PR disaster... it is your wrong perception of time.it is just one month since the announcement. They are asking for input in a directed way. Because they want specific things answered. When looking at the polls, you get a quite good feeling of the things the players want most.My feeling is, that the announcement and the NDAs are ok. I am also sad, not to hear more about the new edition, but I am sure they want to present some later drafts with feedback from the convention worked in.2 month ahead we hopefully get the playtest in our hand. My feeling is, that this would be about the right time.edit: oh, and DCs... In 4e i just make different DCs for the druid who tries to search for traps and the rogue who does so. The druid has a lot better perception, because of his wisdom modifier, but it is a hard task for him, the rogue does the same check as a medium check, as he knows what to do. I can imagine just just decide on the fly to add +2 (or higher) bonuses to simple characters if it is described well and makes sense...</blockquote>