Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="trancejeremy" data-source="post: 5814190" data-attributes="member: 924">I think the gap between fighters and magic-users in "classic" D&D is overstated. A lot of spells had drawbacks or aspects that were mitigated in 3x.For instance, Teleport basically had a 1% of outright killing the caster.And things like spell components and magical aging (like how some spells age the caster) were handwaved or ignored. But those things were meant to keep the more powerful spells from being used too much.Not to mention of course, the 15 minute day didn't exist then, either. It was an endurance race, and MUs were sprinters.And by the book, it took MUs a long, long time to re-learn their spells. 4-12 hours of rest, then another 15 minutes per spell level for each spell, so it would take days, if not a week, for a MU to be at full capacity from zero.That often also got ignored, which yes, made them more powerful. Should the realization that those things would be ignored have been factored into the game? Probably, but D&D was played differently then. But the balance was there, even if the balancing factors were ignored.</blockquote>