Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Enchanted Trinkets Complete--a hardcover book containing over 500 magic items for your D&D games!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Unlimited Opportunity Attacks? Really? Why?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Daern" data-source="post: 4931897" data-attributes="member: 81800"><p>I had a player yesterday explain to me that the rules for opportunity actions are that you get an attack against <em>each and every</em> enemy that moves past your position. This means that you could keep hacking all round.</p><p>I had thought that Opportunity Attacks were an immediate reaction and that Combat Superiority gave fighter an "exceptional" extra attack against their mark.</p><p>Rereading after the game it seems that my player was right. It is the opportunity action that is anomalous in the list of actions. </p><p>My question is, Why? What is the game reason for having it this way? I have always thought the tactic of overrunning a combatant who had used their OA to be a pretty good one.</p><p>It would seem to make more sense to me to limit opportunity actions (as it was in 3e), and to allow fighters to make more than one CS strike if they had multiple people marked. </p><p>So, can someone explain to me why the rules as written make sense or work well? Thanks.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Daern, post: 4931897, member: 81800"] I had a player yesterday explain to me that the rules for opportunity actions are that you get an attack against [I]each and every[/I] enemy that moves past your position. This means that you could keep hacking all round. I had thought that Opportunity Attacks were an immediate reaction and that Combat Superiority gave fighter an "exceptional" extra attack against their mark. Rereading after the game it seems that my player was right. It is the opportunity action that is anomalous in the list of actions. My question is, Why? What is the game reason for having it this way? I have always thought the tactic of overrunning a combatant who had used their OA to be a pretty good one. It would seem to make more sense to me to limit opportunity actions (as it was in 3e), and to allow fighters to make more than one CS strike if they had multiple people marked. So, can someone explain to me why the rules as written make sense or work well? Thanks. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Unlimited Opportunity Attacks? Really? Why?
Top