Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Rocket your D&D 5E and Level Up: Advanced 5E games into space! Alpha Star Magazine Is Launching... Right Now!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Unorthodox Rangers
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Vanuslux" data-source="post: 2011563" data-attributes="member: 937"><p>I was pretty pleased with the review copy I received of Unorthodox Druids, so I went ahead and shelled out $2 for Unorthodox Rangers. The Unorthodox series has been a series of products presenting five alternate versions of a base class. Unorthodox Druids was fairly good. Let's see how the ranger fairs under similar treatment. </p><p></p><p>Appearances: We get three different files in the downloaded. There is a landscaped PDF for screen viewing, a portrait PDF for printing, and an RTF file for those who want to edit in a word processor. This variety of formats is a real plus in The Le Game's favor. The cover art is cool in a really rough style sort of way, depicting a green cloaked figure firing an arrow at point blank range into what looks like a skum (a humanoid fish monster). The interior art is clip art and it does its job, though the portrait they use for the Partisan class is butt ugly. </p><p></p><p>Content: There are five new classes and nothing else in this book. The first thing I notice is that none of these variants on the ranger have spells. I know that a lot of people like the idea of rangers without spells, but I was disappointed that there weren’t any ranger options with spellcasting ability. </p><p></p><p>* Beast Lord: This concept is fairly common among rangers. It's sort of like a fighter who gives up some feat progression and the ability to wear armor for some animal related abilities, favored enemies, natural AC bonuses and damage reduction, and improved unarmed attack damage. The class seems to balance out okay in the end, but I think it would have been more inspiring if it seemed like they had any special ability regarding the beasts they presumably lord over besides a few petty things. They do at least get the Druid's number of companions rather than having their limit halved like a normal ranger. Over all this class is kind of ho-hum...usable but dull.</p><p></p><p>* Hunter: Hunters specialize in bringing things down, usually animals but also monsters and intelligent creatures. They can even use their favored enemy ability against their own race without being evil, which makes perfect sense (there's a lot of good reason to make a living hunting ones own race). They're good at finding their opponents weaknesses and exploiting them. There isn't really anything about them that's terribly nature specific...they're basically just killers with the tracking ability. Obviously, they'd make great bounty hunters. </p><p></p><p>* Outdoorsman: This is a survivalist class, focused on being able to stay alive in the wild. They are fairly uninteresting. They're one of those classes that would be handy to have around but not really much fun to play since their abilities, aside from some defense bonuses, won't come into play much. </p><p></p><p>* Partisan: These are theoretically guerrilla warriors, taking full advantage of their environment. For something one would expect to be rather formidable, they really feel hobbled. Their abilities feel a little haphazard and one of them is called "Fast Enough for you, old Elf" which is the lamest name for a special ability that I've seen in a long time, which is a shame since it's the most interesting ability the Partisan has (being able to avoid generating an attack of opportunity with a reflex check). </p><p></p><p>* Trapper: Some people hunt, other's trap. Trappers have some interesting abilities that make them good at taking people alive, but they certainly do seem to give up a lot for them. </p><p></p><p>In Conclusion - I'm really disappointed in this product. The classes in Unorthodox Druids were really well designed and interesting. The classes in Unorthodox Rangers don't hold a candle to them in terms of quality. The word kludgy comes to mind. All these classes feel like they give up too much for the abilities that they gain, which feel rather haphazard. If you give them the normal ranger spellcasting, a lot (but not all) of the underpowered problem goes away, but it still feels like sloppy design. While not completely worthless, these classes will require too much tinkering to make worthwhile for me to justify giving this product more than two stars.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Vanuslux, post: 2011563, member: 937"] I was pretty pleased with the review copy I received of Unorthodox Druids, so I went ahead and shelled out $2 for Unorthodox Rangers. The Unorthodox series has been a series of products presenting five alternate versions of a base class. Unorthodox Druids was fairly good. Let's see how the ranger fairs under similar treatment. Appearances: We get three different files in the downloaded. There is a landscaped PDF for screen viewing, a portrait PDF for printing, and an RTF file for those who want to edit in a word processor. This variety of formats is a real plus in The Le Game's favor. The cover art is cool in a really rough style sort of way, depicting a green cloaked figure firing an arrow at point blank range into what looks like a skum (a humanoid fish monster). The interior art is clip art and it does its job, though the portrait they use for the Partisan class is butt ugly. Content: There are five new classes and nothing else in this book. The first thing I notice is that none of these variants on the ranger have spells. I know that a lot of people like the idea of rangers without spells, but I was disappointed that there weren’t any ranger options with spellcasting ability. * Beast Lord: This concept is fairly common among rangers. It's sort of like a fighter who gives up some feat progression and the ability to wear armor for some animal related abilities, favored enemies, natural AC bonuses and damage reduction, and improved unarmed attack damage. The class seems to balance out okay in the end, but I think it would have been more inspiring if it seemed like they had any special ability regarding the beasts they presumably lord over besides a few petty things. They do at least get the Druid's number of companions rather than having their limit halved like a normal ranger. Over all this class is kind of ho-hum...usable but dull. * Hunter: Hunters specialize in bringing things down, usually animals but also monsters and intelligent creatures. They can even use their favored enemy ability against their own race without being evil, which makes perfect sense (there's a lot of good reason to make a living hunting ones own race). They're good at finding their opponents weaknesses and exploiting them. There isn't really anything about them that's terribly nature specific...they're basically just killers with the tracking ability. Obviously, they'd make great bounty hunters. * Outdoorsman: This is a survivalist class, focused on being able to stay alive in the wild. They are fairly uninteresting. They're one of those classes that would be handy to have around but not really much fun to play since their abilities, aside from some defense bonuses, won't come into play much. * Partisan: These are theoretically guerrilla warriors, taking full advantage of their environment. For something one would expect to be rather formidable, they really feel hobbled. Their abilities feel a little haphazard and one of them is called "Fast Enough for you, old Elf" which is the lamest name for a special ability that I've seen in a long time, which is a shame since it's the most interesting ability the Partisan has (being able to avoid generating an attack of opportunity with a reflex check). * Trapper: Some people hunt, other's trap. Trappers have some interesting abilities that make them good at taking people alive, but they certainly do seem to give up a lot for them. In Conclusion - I'm really disappointed in this product. The classes in Unorthodox Druids were really well designed and interesting. The classes in Unorthodox Rangers don't hold a candle to them in terms of quality. The word kludgy comes to mind. All these classes feel like they give up too much for the abilities that they gain, which feel rather haphazard. If you give them the normal ranger spellcasting, a lot (but not all) of the underpowered problem goes away, but it still feels like sloppy design. While not completely worthless, these classes will require too much tinkering to make worthwhile for me to justify giving this product more than two stars. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Unorthodox Rangers
Top